| 1 | 236: A. Jaroński - P. Urbański, 9.0, MA |
9 | EW |
6  | E |  5 | +1 |
-1470 | 93.47 |
| 1 | 236: A. Jaroński - P. Urbański, 9.0, MA |
10 | EW |
1 | E |  Q | = |
-90 | 64.69 |
| 1 | 236: A. Jaroński - P. Urbański, 9.0, MA |
11 | EW |
4 | E |  5 | = |
-420 | 79.51 |
| 1 | 236: A. Jaroński - P. Urbański, 9.0, MA |
12 | EW |
2 | W | A | +2 |
-170 | 32.65 |
| 2 | 238: P. Nowicki - A. Marciniak, 12.0, MA |
21 | EW |
5  x | E | 8 | -2 |
300 | 3.66 |
| 2 | 238: P. Nowicki - A. Marciniak, 12.0, MA |
22 | EW |
3 | W | 2 | -2 |
200 | 8.17 |
| 2 | 238: P. Nowicki - A. Marciniak, 12.0, MA |
23 | EW |
4 | E | 5 | = |
-620 | 49.39 |
| 2 | 238: P. Nowicki - A. Marciniak, 12.0, MA |
24 | EW |
6 | W | J | -1 |
50 | 24.29 |
| 3 | 240: R. Kiełkiewicz - J. Maruszewski, 9.0, MA |
13 | NS |
1 | S | 10 | -1 |
-100 | 65.71 |
| 3 | 240: R. Kiełkiewicz - J. Maruszewski, 9.0, MA |
14 | NS |
2 | W | 4 | = |
-120 | 87.35 |
| 3 | 240: R. Kiełkiewicz - J. Maruszewski, 9.0, MA |
15 | NS |
3 | W | J | -1 |
50 | 82.58 |
| 3 | 240: R. Kiełkiewicz - J. Maruszewski, 9.0, MA |
16 | NS |
6 x | S | 2 | -2 |
-300 | 36.53 |
| 4 | 235: J. Wiśniewska - J. Manecki, 9.0, MA |
17 | EW |
5 x | W | K | = |
-550 | 86.73 |
| 4 | 235: J. Wiśniewska - J. Manecki, 9.0, MA |
18 | EW |
4 x | E | 3 | = |
-510 | 98.36 |
| 4 | 235: J. Wiśniewska - J. Manecki, 9.0, MA |
19 | EW |
3 | S | 4 | -3 |
-150 | 92.65 |
| 4 | 235: J. Wiśniewska - J. Manecki, 9.0, MA |
20 | EW |
3 | N | 9 | -1 |
-100 | 87.14 |
| 5 | 237: D. Krupnik - L. Łuniewski, 19.0, MA |
5 | NS |
2 | W | K | +2 |
-170 | 34.08 |
| 5 | 237: D. Krupnik - L. Łuniewski, 19.0, MA |
6 | NS |
2 | N | 2 | = |
120 | 58.16 |
| 5 | 237: D. Krupnik - L. Łuniewski, 19.0, MA |
7 | NS |
3 | N | 5 | +3 |
690 | 47.33 |
| 5 | 237: D. Krupnik - L. Łuniewski, 19.0, MA |
8 | NS |
6 | N | 3 | +1 |
1010 | 47.12 |
| 6 | 239: W. Gardziński - E. Gardzińska, 5.0, MA |
1 | NS |
4 | N | 6 | -1 |
-50 | 59.80 |
| 6 | 239: W. Gardziński - E. Gardzińska, 5.0, MA |
2 | NS |
3 | S | 6 | +1 |
630 | 90.00 |
| 6 | 239: W. Gardziński - E. Gardzińska, 5.0, MA |
3 | NS |
4 | S | 9 | = |
420 | 67.14 |
| 6 | 239: W. Gardziński - E. Gardzińska, 5.0, MA |
4 | NS |
3 x | N | 7 | -1 |
-200 | 10.25 |
| 7 | 242: L. Dzieńkowski - T. Gawroński, 12.0, MA |
25 | EW |
1 | S | 8 | +1 |
120 | 59.88 |
| 7 | 242: L. Dzieńkowski - T. Gawroński, 12.0, MA |
26 | EW |
6 | N | J | -1 |
-100 | 95.97 |
| 7 | 242: L. Dzieńkowski - T. Gawroński, 12.0, MA |
27 | EW |
2 | N | 9 | +1 |
140 | 35.25 |
| 7 | 242: L. Dzieńkowski - T. Gawroński, 12.0, MA |
28 | EW |
4 | W | 8 | +2 |
-480 | 69.96 |
