| 1 | 204: K. Sokół - A. Ciechomski, 9.0, MA |
7 | NS |
4  | E | J | +2 |
-680 | -3.15 |
| 1 | 204: K. Sokół - A. Ciechomski, 9.0, MA |
8 | NS |
3  | E | 10 | = |
-400 | -4.05 |
| 1 | 204: K. Sokół - A. Ciechomski, 9.0, MA |
9 | NS |
6  | E | 8 | +1 |
-1390 | -11.11 |
| 2 | 202: P. Wróblewski - B. Chomentowski, 8.0, MA |
10 | NS |
3  | N | Q | = |
140 | -3.92 |
| 2 | 202: P. Wróblewski - B. Chomentowski, 8.0, MA |
11 | NS |
4  | S | 8 | = |
420 | 1.60 |
| 2 | 202: P. Wróblewski - B. Chomentowski, 8.0, MA |
12 | NS |
1  | W | 8 | -2 |
100 | 2.54 |
| 3 | 200: K. Fryszkowska - E. Kossowska, 4.0, MA |
13 | NS |
3  | E | K | = |
-600 | -3.59 |
| 3 | 200: K. Fryszkowska - E. Kossowska, 4.0, MA |
14 | NS |
4  | E | 8 | -1 |
50 | 3.24 |
| 3 | 200: K. Fryszkowska - E. Kossowska, 4.0, MA |
15 | NS |
2  | N | K | = |
120 | 3.61 |
| 4 | 214: R. Kąkiel - L. Zarębińska, 1.5, MA |
16 | NS |
4  | W | 3 | = |
-620 | -10.48 |
| 4 | 214: R. Kąkiel - L. Zarębińska, 1.5, MA |
17 | NS |
4  | S | K | +2 |
480 | 0.62 |
| 4 | 214: R. Kąkiel - L. Zarębińska, 1.5, MA |
18 | NS |
3  | W | K | +1 |
-130 | 5.77 |
| 6 | 208: P. Witkowski - E. Skopińska, 21.0, MA |
22 | EW |
5  | S | 9 | +2 |
440 | -0.02 |
| 6 | 208: P. Witkowski - E. Skopińska, 21.0, MA |
23 | EW |
3  | S | 4 | +1 |
630 | -1.08 |
| 6 | 208: P. Witkowski - E. Skopińska, 21.0, MA |
24 | EW |
4  | S | Q | +1 |
150 | 2.15 |
| 7 | 206: L. Murat - Z. Szuchnik, 9.0, LU/MA |
1 | EW |
3  | E | 5 | = |
-400 | 2.37 |
| 7 | 206: L. Murat - Z. Szuchnik, 9.0, LU/MA |
2 | EW |
1  | N | K | +3 |
180 | -4.06 |
| 7 | 206: L. Murat - Z. Szuchnik, 9.0, LU/MA |
3 | EW |
4  | N | 9 | = |
130 | -1.76 |
| 8 | 212: A. Piesiewicz - D. Sikorska-Piesiewicz, 7.0, MA |
25 | NS |
4  | N | A | = |
420 | 1.18 |
| 8 | 212: A. Piesiewicz - D. Sikorska-Piesiewicz, 7.0, MA |
26 | NS |
2  | W | 10 | +1 |
-110 | -2.48 |
| 8 | 212: A. Piesiewicz - D. Sikorska-Piesiewicz, 7.0, MA |
27 | NS |
4 x | W | 10 | -1 |
100 | 1.66 |
| 9 | 211: J. Cel - H. Osiński, 6.0, MA |
28 | EW |
4  | E | K | +2 |
-480 | 1.37 |
| 9 | 211: J. Cel - H. Osiński, 6.0, MA |
29 | EW |
3  | N | J | +1 |
630 | -3.22 |
| 9 | 211: J. Cel - H. Osiński, 6.0, MA |
30 | EW |
2  | N | Q | = |
110 | -3.03 |