| 1 | 146: K. Falkowski - R. Kiełkiewicz, 10.0, MA |
1 | EW |
4  x | S |  K | -4 |
-800 | 93.95 |
| 1 | 146: K. Falkowski - R. Kiełkiewicz, 10.0, MA |
2 | EW |
3  | W | 2 | = |
-140 | 70.72 |
| 1 | 146: K. Falkowski - R. Kiełkiewicz, 10.0, MA |
3 | EW |
3 | N |  J | = |
140 | 43.75 |
| 1 | 146: K. Falkowski - R. Kiełkiewicz, 10.0, MA |
4 | EW |
3 | W | Q | -1 |
100 | 58.88 |
| 1 | 146: K. Falkowski - R. Kiełkiewicz, 10.0, MA |
5 | EW |
1 | N | 5 | -1 |
-100 | 63.73 |
| 1 | 146: K. Falkowski - R. Kiełkiewicz, 10.0, MA |
6 | EW |
5 | S | J | = |
400 | 11.19 |
| 2 | 143: A. Jaroński - M. Kołakowska, 5.5, MA |
7 | NS |
2  | N | 2 | +1 |
150 | 86.93 |
| 2 | 143: A. Jaroński - M. Kołakowska, 5.5, MA |
8 | NS |
4 | E | A | +1 |
-450 | 48.68 |
| 2 | 143: A. Jaroński - M. Kołakowska, 5.5, MA |
9 | NS |
2 | N | Q | +1 |
140 | 26.14 |
| 2 | 143: A. Jaroński - M. Kołakowska, 5.5, MA |
10 | NS |
6 | N | 8 | -1 |
-100 | 9.15 |
| 2 | 143: A. Jaroński - M. Kołakowska, 5.5, MA |
11 | NS |
3 | E | Q | = |
-400 | 18.30 |
| 2 | 143: A. Jaroński - M. Kołakowska, 5.5, MA |
12 | NS |
2 | E | 9 | -1 |
50 | 41.50 |
| 3 | 145: R. Maszenda - M. Maszenda, 9.0, MA |
13 | NS |
4 | W | 9 | +1 |
-650 | 7.24 |
| 3 | 145: R. Maszenda - M. Maszenda, 9.0, MA |
14 | NS |
3 | W | 5 | +3 |
-490 | 11.76 |
| 3 | 145: R. Maszenda - M. Maszenda, 9.0, MA |
15 | NS |
4 | E | K | = |
-420 | 50.00 |
| 3 | 145: R. Maszenda - M. Maszenda, 9.0, MA |
16 | NS |
5 | N | 9 | -2 |
-100 | 23.86 |
| 3 | 145: R. Maszenda - M. Maszenda, 9.0, MA |
17 | NS |
6 | W | 10 | +1 |
-1010 | 36.51 |
| 3 | 145: R. Maszenda - M. Maszenda, 9.0, MA |
18 | NS |
3 | W | Q | -2 |
100 | 52.96 |
| 4 | 142: J. Dankowski - W. Skupiński, 4.0, MA |
19 | EW |
1 x | E | 5 | = |
-160 | 98.04 |
| 4 | 142: J. Dankowski - W. Skupiński, 4.0, MA |
20 | EW |
5 | W | A | -1 |
100 | 67.97 |
| 4 | 142: J. Dankowski - W. Skupiński, 4.0, MA |
21 | EW |
2 | E | Q | +1 |
-140 | 77.78 |
| 4 | 142: J. Dankowski - W. Skupiński, 4.0, MA |
22 | EW |
5 | W | 8 | +1 |
-680 | 72.55 |
| 4 | 142: J. Dankowski - W. Skupiński, 4.0, MA |
23 | EW |
2 | N | Q | -2 |
-200 | 72.22 |
| 4 | 142: J. Dankowski - W. Skupiński, 4.0, MA |
24 | EW |
1 | N | K | = |
80 | 70.72 |
| 5 | 144: J. Słomski - J. Wiśniewska, 6.5, MA |
25 | EW |
3 | E | 3 | +1 |
-630 | 81.70 |
| 5 | 144: J. Słomski - J. Wiśniewska, 6.5, MA |
26 | EW |
1 | N | 6 | = |
90 | 52.96 |
| 5 | 144: J. Słomski - J. Wiśniewska, 6.5, MA |
27 | EW |
3 | S | 4 | +1 |
170 | 66.03 |
| 5 | 144: J. Słomski - J. Wiśniewska, 6.5, MA |
28 | EW |
6 | S | Q | = |
1430 | 2.89 |
| 5 | 144: J. Słomski - J. Wiśniewska, 6.5, MA |
29 | EW |
3 | S | 2 | +2 |
660 | 13.09 |
| 5 | 144: J. Słomski - J. Wiśniewska, 6.5, MA |
30 | EW |
3 | S | 9 | +2 |
200 | 70.47 |
