1 | 1: Z. Niemirski - T. Szczęśniewicz, 1.0, DS/- |
1 | NS |
5 | E | 5 | -1 |
50 | 4.26 |
1 | 1: Z. Niemirski - T. Szczęśniewicz, 1.0, DS/- |
2 | NS |
2 | S | J | = |
120 | 1.68 |
1 | 1: Z. Niemirski - T. Szczęśniewicz, 1.0, DS/- |
3 | NS |
3 | W | 7 | -2 |
200 | 6.00 |
1 | 1: Z. Niemirski - T. Szczęśniewicz, 1.0, DS/- |
4 | NS |
6 | S | 7 | +1 |
1470 | 3.14 |
1 | 1: Z. Niemirski - T. Szczęśniewicz, 1.0, DS/- |
5 | NS |
6 | N | 4 | -1 |
-100 | -10.17 |
1 | 1: Z. Niemirski - T. Szczęśniewicz, 1.0, DS/- |
6 | NS |
2 | W | A | = |
-110 | -1.52 |
2 | 2: E. Lis - T. Freitag, 7.5, DS |
7 | NS |
4 | S | 5 | = |
620 | 2.43 |
2 | 2: E. Lis - T. Freitag, 7.5, DS |
8 | NS |
4 | S | 2 | -1 |
-50 | -5.83 |
2 | 2: E. Lis - T. Freitag, 7.5, DS |
9 | NS |
3 | W | 8 | +2 |
-660 | -6.27 |
2 | 2: E. Lis - T. Freitag, 7.5, DS |
10 | NS |
2 | W | K | = |
-110 | -0.61 |
2 | 2: E. Lis - T. Freitag, 7.5, DS |
11 | NS |
4 | N | 8 | -1 |
-50 | 0.52 |
2 | 2: E. Lis - T. Freitag, 7.5, DS |
12 | NS |
2 | S | K | = |
110 | 4.26 |
3 | 3: I. Kwiatosz - E. Matczuk, 1.5, DS/- |
13 | NS |
4 | S | 5 | +1 |
650 | 2.39 |
3 | 3: I. Kwiatosz - E. Matczuk, 1.5, DS/- |
14 | NS |
3 | N | 10 | +2 |
200 | -2.13 |
3 | 3: I. Kwiatosz - E. Matczuk, 1.5, DS/- |
15 | NS |
3 | E | 3 | +3 |
-170 | 7.26 |
3 | 3: I. Kwiatosz - E. Matczuk, 1.5, DS/- |
16 | NS |
3 | S | A | +1 |
170 | -0.74 |
3 | 3: I. Kwiatosz - E. Matczuk, 1.5, DS/- |
17 | NS |
3 | S | 3 | = |
400 | 3.17 |
3 | 3: I. Kwiatosz - E. Matczuk, 1.5, DS/- |
18 | NS |
4 | N | 10 | +1 |
650 | 2.96 |
4 | 4: K. Ślęczek - J. Romańczyk, 5.0, -/DS |
19 | NS |
4 | W | A | +1 |
-650 | -1.04 |
4 | 4: K. Ślęczek - J. Romańczyk, 5.0, -/DS |
20 | NS |
2 | W | Q | = |
-110 | -4.96 |
4 | 4: K. Ślęczek - J. Romańczyk, 5.0, -/DS |
21 | NS |
1 | N | J | -2 |
-200 | -3.48 |
4 | 4: K. Ślęczek - J. Romańczyk, 5.0, -/DS |
22 | NS |
3 | N | 2 | = |
400 | 4.42 |
4 | 4: K. Ślęczek - J. Romańczyk, 5.0, -/DS |
23 | NS |
3 | N | Q | -2 |
-200 | 0.21 |
4 | 4: K. Ślęczek - J. Romańczyk, 5.0, -/DS |
24 | NS |
2 | W | Q | = |
-110 | -0.83 |
5 | 5: M. Hutnik - T. Janeczek, 4.0, DS |
25 | NS |
4 | N | K | = |
420 | 2.39 |
5 | 5: M. Hutnik - T. Janeczek, 4.0, DS |
26 | NS |
4 | E | 5 | = |
-620 | -5.61 |
5 | 5: M. Hutnik - T. Janeczek, 4.0, DS |
27 | NS |
2 | E | 3 | = |
-90 | -3.43 |
5 | 5: M. Hutnik - T. Janeczek, 4.0, DS |
28 | NS |
5 | E | A | = |
-450 | -0.85 |
5 | 5: M. Hutnik - T. Janeczek, 4.0, DS |
29 | NS |
4 | S | 6 | = |
620 | 9.40 |
5 | 5: M. Hutnik - T. Janeczek, 4.0, DS |
30 | NS |
2 | E | K | -1 |
50 | 1.60 |