| 0 | 9: M. Pruchniewska - W. Żurawicz, 6.0, KP |
1 | EW |
4 x | N | | -1 |
-100 | 3.13 |
| 0 | 9: M. Pruchniewska - W. Żurawicz, 6.0, KP |
2 | EW |
2  | W | | = |
-110 | -0.91 |
| 0 | 9: M. Pruchniewska - W. Żurawicz, 6.0, KP |
3 | EW |
5 x | E | | -4 |
1100 | -14.28 |
| 0 | 9: M. Pruchniewska - W. Żurawicz, 6.0, KP |
4 | EW |
2  | W | | -3 |
300 | -7.36 |
| 0 | 9: M. Pruchniewska - W. Żurawicz, 6.0, KP |
5 | EW |
2  | N | | +1 |
140 | 0.06 |
| 0 | 9: M. Pruchniewska - W. Żurawicz, 6.0, KP |
6 | EW |
4  | E | | = |
-620 | 1.63 |
| 0 | 14: A. Szmidt - W. Płaczkiewicz, 0.5, -/KP |
7 | NS |
2  | E | | -1 |
100 | -0.21 |
| 0 | 14: A. Szmidt - W. Płaczkiewicz, 0.5, -/KP |
8 | NS |
1  | E | | -2 |
100 | 1.19 |
| 0 | 14: A. Szmidt - W. Płaczkiewicz, 0.5, -/KP |
9 | NS |
7  | S | | = |
1520 | 9.06 |
| 0 | 14: A. Szmidt - W. Płaczkiewicz, 0.5, -/KP |
10 | NS |
2  | E | | +1 |
-140 | 0.11 |
| 0 | 14: A. Szmidt - W. Płaczkiewicz, 0.5, -/KP |
11 | NS |
3  | W | | +1 |
-130 | -1.87 |
| 0 | 14: A. Szmidt - W. Płaczkiewicz, 0.5, -/KP |
12 | NS |
3  | W | | +2 |
-460 | -1.91 |
| 0 | 11: A. Sekuła - W. Wójciak, 12.0, KP |
13 | NS |
6  | N | | +1 |
1460 | 4.98 |
| 0 | 11: A. Sekuła - W. Wójciak, 12.0, KP |
14 | NS |
5 x | N | | -2 |
-300 | -3.04 |
| 0 | 11: A. Sekuła - W. Wójciak, 12.0, KP |
15 | NS |
4  | N | | = |
630 | 0.54 |
| 0 | 11: A. Sekuła - W. Wójciak, 12.0, KP |
16 | NS |
3  | S | | = |
110 | 3.26 |
| 0 | 11: A. Sekuła - W. Wójciak, 12.0, KP |
17 | NS |
3  | W | | +1 |
-130 | 0.40 |
| 0 | 11: A. Sekuła - W. Wójciak, 12.0, KP |
18 | NS |
2  | E | | +1 |
-140 | -1.57 |
| 0 | 12: E. Malka - M. Ciesielski, 0.5, KP/- |
19 | EW |
3  | E | | = |
-600 | 7.89 |
| 0 | 12: E. Malka - M. Ciesielski, 0.5, KP/- |
20 | EW |
3  | S | | +3 |
690 | -1.74 |
| 0 | 12: E. Malka - M. Ciesielski, 0.5, KP/- |
21 | EW |
4  | W | | -1 |
50 | -4.64 |
| 0 | 12: E. Malka - M. Ciesielski, 0.5, KP/- |
22 | EW |
4  | W | | +1 |
-650 | 0.57 |
| 0 | 12: E. Malka - M. Ciesielski, 0.5, KP/- |
23 | EW |
2  | W | | -2 |
200 | -3.15 |
| 0 | 12: E. Malka - M. Ciesielski, 0.5, KP/- |
24 | EW |
3  | W | | +1 |
-430 | 5.00 |
| 0 | 13: M. Operlejn - J. Piwoński, 5.0, KP |
25 | EW |
3 x | S | | = |
550 | -8.03 |
| 0 | 13: M. Operlejn - J. Piwoński, 5.0, KP |
26 | EW |
1  | E | | = |
-90 | 1.50 |
| 0 | 13: M. Operlejn - J. Piwoński, 5.0, KP |
27 | EW |
3  | S | | = |
110 | -2.08 |
| 0 | 13: M. Operlejn - J. Piwoński, 5.0, KP |
28 | EW |
1  | N | | = |
90 | -1.45 |
| 0 | 13: M. Operlejn - J. Piwoński, 5.0, KP |
29 | EW |
3  | S | | = |
140 | -2.71 |
| 0 | 13: M. Operlejn - J. Piwoński, 5.0, KP |
30 | EW |
4  | S | | -1 |
-50 | 1.86 |