| 1 | 69: B. Krzewski - R. Maszenda, 13.0, MA |
1 | NS |
4  | S | 9 | = |
420 | 29.08 |
| 1 | 69: B. Krzewski - R. Maszenda, 13.0, MA |
2 | NS |
4  | W | 3 | +1 |
-150 | 15.13 |
| 1 | 69: B. Krzewski - R. Maszenda, 13.0, MA |
3 | NS |
4  | N | 7 | -2 |
-100 | 19.78 |
| 1 | 69: B. Krzewski - R. Maszenda, 13.0, MA |
4 | NS |
4  | W | 4 | = |
-620 | 42.86 |
| 2 | 70: M. Wiącek - D. Krajewski, 25.0, MA |
5 | NS |
3  | W | K | +2 |
-460 | 5.84 |
| 2 | 70: M. Wiącek - D. Krajewski, 25.0, MA |
6 | NS |
4 x | W | 6 | -1 |
200 | 40.70 |
| 2 | 70: M. Wiącek - D. Krajewski, 25.0, MA |
7 | NS |
4  | S | 3 | = |
620 | 50.00 |
| 2 | 70: M. Wiącek - D. Krajewski, 25.0, MA |
8 | NS |
4  | S | 3 | -1 |
-50 | 25.59 |
| 3 | 71: L. Pęcherzewski - A. Marciniak, 14.0, MA |
9 | NS |
2  | E | 9 | +2 |
-170 | 15.08 |
| 3 | 71: L. Pęcherzewski - A. Marciniak, 14.0, MA |
10 | NS |
2  | W | J | +1 |
-110 | 26.76 |
| 3 | 71: L. Pęcherzewski - A. Marciniak, 14.0, MA |
11 | NS |
2  | N | 7 | +2 |
170 | 41.86 |
| 3 | 71: L. Pęcherzewski - A. Marciniak, 14.0, MA |
12 | NS |
5  | S | K | -1 |
-100 | 18.62 |
| 4 | 72: P. Urbański - K. Wośkowiak, 11.0, KP/MA |
13 | NS |
2 x | N | K | -3 |
-800 | 0.08 |
| 4 | 72: P. Urbański - K. Wośkowiak, 11.0, KP/MA |
14 | NS |
2  | W | Q | +3 |
-200 | 88.96 |
| 4 | 72: P. Urbański - K. Wośkowiak, 11.0, KP/MA |
15 | NS |
4  | E | J | -2 |
100 | 61.62 |
| 4 | 72: P. Urbański - K. Wośkowiak, 11.0, KP/MA |
16 | NS |
4 x | S | 3 | = |
590 | 90.68 |
| 5 | 73: D. Krupnik - J. Szczygieł, 12.0, MA |
17 | NS |
3  | W | 5 | +3 |
-490 | 31.40 |
| 5 | 73: D. Krupnik - J. Szczygieł, 12.0, MA |
18 | NS |
2  | S | K | +2 |
170 | 44.19 |
| 5 | 73: D. Krupnik - J. Szczygieł, 12.0, MA |
19 | NS |
3  | N | 6 | +1 |
430 | 77.89 |
| 5 | 73: D. Krupnik - J. Szczygieł, 12.0, MA |
20 | NS |
3  | E | 2 | +2 |
-660 | 5.84 |
| 6 | 74: J. Maruszewski - R. Kiełkiewicz, 9.0, MA |
21 | NS |
5 x | W | K | -1 |
100 | 95.33 |
| 6 | 74: J. Maruszewski - R. Kiełkiewicz, 9.0, MA |
22 | NS |
4  | N | A | = |
420 | 63.95 |
| 6 | 74: J. Maruszewski - R. Kiełkiewicz, 9.0, MA |
23 | NS |
4  | W | 4 | +3 |
-710 | 27.92 |
| 6 | 74: J. Maruszewski - R. Kiełkiewicz, 9.0, MA |
24 | NS |
6  | W | A | -2 |
100 | 94.16 |
| 7 | 75: J. Słomski - J. Dankowski, 3.0, MA |
25 | NS |
4  | N | J | -1 |
-50 | 80.68 |
| 7 | 75: J. Słomski - J. Dankowski, 3.0, MA |
26 | NS |
2  | S | A | +1 |
150 | 65.11 |
| 7 | 75: J. Słomski - J. Dankowski, 3.0, MA |
27 | NS |
4  | E | 3 | = |
-420 | 64.42 |
| 7 | 75: J. Słomski - J. Dankowski, 3.0, MA |
28 | NS |
6  | N | K | -2 |
-200 | 7.68 |