| 1 | 296: K. Orzechowski - H. Pakuła, 10.0, ZP |
4 | NS |
4  | N | A | = |
620 | 75.49 |
| 1 | 296: K. Orzechowski - H. Pakuła, 10.0, ZP |
5 | NS |
3  | N | 9 | +1 |
630 | 51.32 |
| 1 | 296: K. Orzechowski - H. Pakuła, 10.0, ZP |
6 | NS |
3  | W | 8 | -1 |
100 | 89.47 |
| 1 | 296: K. Orzechowski - H. Pakuła, 10.0, ZP |
8 | NS |
4  | W | 5 | +1 |
-450 | 31.91 |
| 2 | 298: L. Błaziński - J. Sadowski, 24.0, ZP |
9 | EW |
4  | E | 5 | +1 |
-650 | 96.08 |
| 2 | 298: L. Błaziński - J. Sadowski, 24.0, ZP |
10 | EW |
4  | S | 3 | -1 |
-100 | 6.96 |
| 2 | 298: L. Błaziński - J. Sadowski, 24.0, ZP |
11 | EW |
5  | N | A | -1 |
-50 | 66.01 |
| 2 | 298: L. Błaziński - J. Sadowski, 24.0, ZP |
12 | EW |
3  | W | K | +3 |
-490 | 73.03 |
| 3 | 293: J. Jermakowicz - T. Mediuch, 0.5, -/ZP |
25 | NS |
5  | S | Q | = |
450 | 81.70 |
| 3 | 293: J. Jermakowicz - T. Mediuch, 0.5, -/ZP |
26 | NS |
2  | N | 4 | +3 |
200 | 78.95 |
| 3 | 293: J. Jermakowicz - T. Mediuch, 0.5, -/ZP |
27 | NS |
3  | E | A | +2 |
-150 | 65.25 |
| 3 | 293: J. Jermakowicz - T. Mediuch, 0.5, -/ZP |
28 | NS |
7  | N | Q | = |
2220 | 76.36 |
| 4 | 295: W. Glina - J. Kowalczyk, 0.0, NZ/- |
21 | NS |
3  | E | A | = |
-110 | 12.42 |
| 4 | 295: W. Glina - J. Kowalczyk, 0.0, NZ/- |
22 | NS |
2  | W | 2 | = |
-110 | 56.21 |
| 4 | 295: W. Glina - J. Kowalczyk, 0.0, NZ/- |
23 | NS |
1  | E | 3 | -1 |
100 | 50.99 |
| 4 | 295: W. Glina - J. Kowalczyk, 0.0, NZ/- |
24 | NS |
1  | S | 3 | +2 |
150 | 64.14 |
| 5 | 299: A. Kondyjowska - K. Wiliński, 11.0, ZP |
7 | EW |
3  | W | 7 | +2 |
-200 | 64.05 |
| 5 | 294: E. Kaczmarek - L. Sulżycki, 16.0, ZP |
17 | EW |
3  | E | 2 | +1 |
-430 | 94.77 |
| 5 | 294: E. Kaczmarek - L. Sulżycki, 16.0, ZP |
18 | EW |
3  | S | X | +1 |
630 | 64.71 |
| 5 | 294: E. Kaczmarek - L. Sulżycki, 16.0, ZP |
19 | EW |
3  | W | X | +1 |
-630 | 60.20 |
| 5 | 294: E. Kaczmarek - L. Sulżycki, 16.0, ZP |
20 | EW |
6  | N | A | -1 |
-100 | 92.16 |
| 6 | 299: A. Kondyjowska - K. Wiliński, 11.0, ZP |
1 | EW |
5 x | W | K | -1 |
100 | 52.61 |
| 6 | 299: A. Kondyjowska - K. Wiliński, 11.0, ZP |
2 | EW |
3  | N | | = |
140 | 68.75 |
| 6 | 299: A. Kondyjowska - K. Wiliński, 11.0, ZP |
3 | EW |
3  | E | T | -1 |
100 | 35.29 |
| 7 | 300: W. Mateńko - M. Silski, 4.0, ZP/- |
13 | EW |
4  | W | J | -2 |
200 | 16.01 |
| 7 | 300: W. Mateńko - M. Silski, 4.0, ZP/- |
14 | EW |
3  | N | 6 | +1 |
130 | 47.37 |
| 7 | 300: W. Mateńko - M. Silski, 4.0, ZP/- |
15 | EW |
2  | W | J | = |
-110 | 82.03 |
| 7 | 300: W. Mateńko - M. Silski, 4.0, ZP/- |
16 | EW |
4  | E | K | = |
-620 | 71.85 |