| 1 | 267: W. Korbutowicz - H. Pakuła, 10.0, ZP |
21 | EW |
| | | |
50 | 30.97 |
| 1 | 267: W. Korbutowicz - H. Pakuła, 10.0, ZP |
22 | EW |
| | | |
110 | 40.67 |
| 1 | 267: W. Korbutowicz - H. Pakuła, 10.0, ZP |
23 | EW |
| | | |
-100 | 54.48 |
| 1 | 267: W. Korbutowicz - H. Pakuła, 10.0, ZP |
24 | EW |
| | | |
170 | 48.86 |
| 1 | 267: W. Korbutowicz - H. Pakuła, 10.0, ZP |
25 | EW |
| | | |
-500 | 75.56 |
| 2 | 266: E. Kaczmarek - L. Sulżycki, 16.0, ZP |
1 | NS |
| | | |
50 | 46.57 |
| 2 | 266: E. Kaczmarek - L. Sulżycki, 16.0, ZP |
2 | NS |
| | | |
130 | 79.32 |
| 2 | 266: E. Kaczmarek - L. Sulżycki, 16.0, ZP |
3 | NS |
| | | |
150 | 62.03 |
| 2 | 266: E. Kaczmarek - L. Sulżycki, 16.0, ZP |
4 | NS |
| | | |
-1430 | 22.94 |
| 2 | 266: E. Kaczmarek - L. Sulżycki, 16.0, ZP |
5 | NS |
| | | |
110 | 87.59 |
| 2 | 269: J. Linkiewicz - A. Żmuda, 8.0, ZP |
11 | NS |
| | | |
430 | 70.30 |
| 2 | 269: J. Linkiewicz - A. Żmuda, 8.0, ZP |
12 | NS |
| | | |
-100 | 39.40 |
| 2 | 269: J. Linkiewicz - A. Żmuda, 8.0, ZP |
13 | NS |
| | | |
-600 | 32.71 |
| 2 | 269: J. Linkiewicz - A. Żmuda, 8.0, ZP |
14 | NS |
| | | |
400 | 33.08 |
| 2 | 269: J. Linkiewicz - A. Żmuda, 8.0, ZP |
15 | NS |
| | | |
710 | 19.32 |
| 2 | 271: B. Wiliński - K. Wiliński, 8.0, ZP |
16 | EW |
| | | |
-630 | 75.56 |
| 2 | 271: B. Wiliński - K. Wiliński, 8.0, ZP |
17 | EW |
| | | |
90 | 38.55 |
| 2 | 271: B. Wiliński - K. Wiliński, 8.0, ZP |
18 | EW |
| | | |
170 | 54.89 |
| 2 | 271: B. Wiliński - K. Wiliński, 8.0, ZP |
19 | EW |
| | | |
90 | 35.08 |
| 2 | 271: B. Wiliński - K. Wiliński, 8.0, ZP |
20 | EW |
| | | |
620 | 51.49 |
| 2 | 268: L. Błaziński - K. Orzechowski, 17.0, ZP |
30 | NS |
| | | |
420 | 57.04 |
| 2 | 268: L. Błaziński - K. Orzechowski, 17.0, ZP |
31 | NS |
| | | |
-420 | 6.91 |
| 2 | 268: L. Błaziński - K. Orzechowski, 17.0, ZP |
32 | NS |
| | | |
-680 | 59.10 |
| 2 | 268: L. Błaziński - K. Orzechowski, 17.0, ZP |
33 | NS |
| | | |
180 | 11.90 |
| 4 | 265: W. Mateńko - M. Silski, 4.0, ZP/NZ |
6 | EW |
| | | |
140 | 71.37 |
| 4 | 265: W. Mateńko - M. Silski, 4.0, ZP/NZ |
7 | EW |
| | | |
-150 | 72.18 |
| 4 | 265: W. Mateńko - M. Silski, 4.0, ZP/NZ |
8 | EW |
| | | |
-100 | 84.09 |
| 4 | 265: W. Mateńko - M. Silski, 4.0, ZP/NZ |
9 | EW |
| | | |
-150 | 95.86 |
| 4 | 265: W. Mateńko - M. Silski, 4.0, ZP/NZ |
10 | EW |
| | | |
-140 | 45.11 |
| 4 | 272: J. Dziemidowicz - S. Kamiński, 8.0, ZP |
26 | EW |
| | | |
110 | 30.37 |
| 4 | 272: J. Dziemidowicz - S. Kamiński, 8.0, ZP |
27 | EW |
| | | |
450 | 38.89 |
| 4 | 272: J. Dziemidowicz - S. Kamiński, 8.0, ZP |
28 | EW |
| | | |
150 | 63.70 |
| 4 | 272: J. Dziemidowicz - S. Kamiński, 8.0, ZP |
29 | EW |
| | | |
-200 | 76.51 |