| 1 | 88: E. Więch - W. Rutkowski, 2.5, -/MA |
| EW |
3  | S | A | = |
110 | 80.21 |
| 1 | 88: E. Więch - W. Rutkowski, 2.5, -/MA |
| EW |
2  | E | 3 | -1 |
50 | 24.22 |
| 1 | 88: E. Więch - W. Rutkowski, 2.5, -/MA |
| EW |
1  | S | Q | -2 |
-100 | 84.20 |
| 1 | 88: E. Więch - W. Rutkowski, 2.5, -/MA |
| EW |
2  | S | 5 | +2 |
170 | 54.69 |
| 2 | 86: S. Stachlewski - A. Dachowski, 8.5, MA |
| EW |
3 x | E | J | -3 |
800 | 9.79 |
| 2 | 86: S. Stachlewski - A. Dachowski, 8.5, MA |
| EW |
3  | N | J | +1 |
130 | 78.35 |
| 2 | 86: S. Stachlewski - A. Dachowski, 8.5, MA |
| EW |
1  | E | Q | -1 |
50 | 32.99 |
| 2 | 86: S. Stachlewski - A. Dachowski, 8.5, MA |
| EW |
3  | W | 7 | +1 |
-430 | 21.13 |
| 3 | 80: K. Paluchowska - E. Treichel, 2.5, MA |
| NS |
4  | W | Q | +1 |
-650 | 56.77 |
| 3 | 80: K. Paluchowska - E. Treichel, 2.5, MA |
| NS |
6  | N | 7 | -1 |
-50 | 13.55 |
| 3 | 80: K. Paluchowska - E. Treichel, 2.5, MA |
| NS |
3  | W | K | +3 |
-490 | 23.96 |
| 3 | 80: K. Paluchowska - E. Treichel, 2.5, MA |
| NS |
3  | S | J | -2 |
-100 | 86.08 |
| 4 | 84: T. Mikołajczyk - T. Pawlak, 4.0, MA |
| EW |
5  | W | J | +2 |
-440 | 75.52 |
| 4 | 84: T. Mikołajczyk - T. Pawlak, 4.0, MA |
| EW |
4  | E | A | -1 |
100 | 10.42 |
| 4 | 84: T. Mikołajczyk - T. Pawlak, 4.0, MA |
| EW |
2  | S | A | -1 |
-100 | 9.79 |
| 4 | 84: T. Mikołajczyk - T. Pawlak, 4.0, MA |
| EW |
4 x | E | K | -1 |
100 | 81.44 |
| 5 | 87: M. Blutchard - D. Wacławek, 1.0, MA |
| NS |
3  | W | A | -1 |
100 | 36.08 |
| 5 | 87: M. Blutchard - D. Wacławek, 1.0, MA |
| NS |
4 x | S | 5 | +1 |
990 | 98.43 |
| 5 | 87: M. Blutchard - D. Wacławek, 1.0, MA |
| NS |
4 x | N | J | = |
590 | 91.24 |
| 5 | 87: M. Blutchard - D. Wacławek, 1.0, MA |
| NS |
3  | E | 5 | = |
-400 | 62.63 |
| 6 | 85: P. Józefaciuk - M. Rawski, 4.0, MA |
| NS |
3  | N | 6 | = |
600 | 52.06 |
| 6 | 85: P. Józefaciuk - M. Rawski, 4.0, MA |
| NS |
1  | N | 6 | -1 |
-50 | 54.12 |
| 6 | 85: P. Józefaciuk - M. Rawski, 4.0, MA |
| NS |
4  | E | 4 | -1 |
100 | 90.72 |
| 6 | 85: P. Józefaciuk - M. Rawski, 4.0, MA |
| NS |
2 x | N | 9 | -1 |
-100 | 34.02 |
| 7 | 82: J. Romaniuk - M. Wrocławski, 9.5, MA/LD |
| NS |
4 x | N | 2 | -3 |
-500 | 19.59 |
| 7 | 82: J. Romaniuk - M. Wrocławski, 9.5, MA/LD |
| NS |
6  | E | 4 | = |
-920 | 17.01 |
| 7 | 82: J. Romaniuk - M. Wrocławski, 9.5, MA/LD |
| NS |
1  | W | 3 | +2 |
-150 | 7.22 |
| 7 | 82: J. Romaniuk - M. Wrocławski, 9.5, MA/LD |
| NS |
6  | W | 10 | = |
-1440 | 21.13 |
| 8 | 81: J. Koter - J. Jodełka, 6.5, MA |
| EW |
2  | N | A | +1 |
140 | 18.56 |
| 8 | 81: J. Koter - J. Jodełka, 6.5, MA |
| EW |
5 x | E | A | -6 |
1400 | 0.00 |
| 8 | 81: J. Koter - J. Jodełka, 6.5, MA |
| EW |
2  | E | A | +1 |
-150 | 83.51 |
| 8 | 81: J. Koter - J. Jodełka, 6.5, MA |
| EW |
6 x | W | A | -3 |
800 | 29.90 |