| 1 | 98: U. Kielak - A. Sasin, 3.0, MA |
| NS |
6  x | E |  8 | -2 |
300 | 74.12 |
| 1 | 98: U. Kielak - A. Sasin, 3.0, MA |
| NS |
2  | E | 8 | = |
-110 | 38.60 |
| 2 | 95: A. Zaręba - P. Godlewski, 2.0, MA |
| NS |
1  | N | J | = |
90 | 68.46 |
| 2 | 95: A. Zaręba - P. Godlewski, 2.0, MA |
| NS |
3  | N | A | +1 |
170 | 18.42 |
| 3 | 84: S. Dybiec - S. Berwid, 5.0, MA |
| NS |
4 | W | K | +2 |
-480 | 10.09 |
| 3 | 84: S. Dybiec - S. Berwid, 5.0, MA |
| NS |
4 | N | 6 | +1 |
450 | 77.72 |
| 4 | 94: B. Kamiński - J. Paluchowski, 2.5, MA |
| NS |
4 | W | 8 | -2 |
100 | 64.16 |
| 4 | 94: B. Kamiński - J. Paluchowski, 2.5, MA |
| NS |
4 | W | J | -4 |
200 | 99.11 |
| 5 | 91: R. Kowalewicz - A. Sobula, 2.0, MA |
| NS |
6 | N | 3 | = |
990 | 93.30 |
| 5 | 91: R. Kowalewicz - A. Sobula, 2.0, MA |
| NS |
2 | N | 5 | +2 |
170 | 28.95 |
| 6 | 92: J. Dziekańska - T. Sadowski, 2.0, MA |
| NS |
3 | S | 5 | -1 |
-100 | 21.93 |
| 6 | 92: J. Dziekańska - T. Sadowski, 2.0, MA |
| NS |
4 | N | 2 | -1 |
-50 | 15.35 |
| 7 | 89: J. Lech - J. Sowiński, 2.0, MA |
| NS |
3 | S | K | +2 |
150 | 89.04 |
| 7 | 89: J. Lech - J. Sowiński, 2.0, MA |
| NS |
3 | E | A | -1 |
50 | 12.83 |
| 8 | 87: H. Sawicki - J. Krzemiński, 0.0, |
| NS |
3 x | N | J | -1 |
-100 | 22.81 |
| 8 | 87: H. Sawicki - J. Krzemiński, 0.0, |
| NS |
4 | N | 3 | +1 |
650 | 69.74 |
| 9 | 85: M. Gruziel - T. Kozłowski, 5.0, MA |
| NS |
2 | S | 3 | = |
110 | 89.47 |
| 9 | 85: M. Gruziel - T. Kozłowski, 5.0, MA |
| NS |
6 x | S | 3 | -2 |
-500 | 0.00 |
| 10 | 82: J. Szymaszczyk - P. Szymaszczyk, 7.0, MA |
| NS |
3 | E | A | +1 |
-170 | 46.93 |
| 10 | 82: J. Szymaszczyk - P. Szymaszczyk, 7.0, MA |
| NS |
1 | S | 6 | = |
80 | 59.65 |
| 11 | 88: W. Makarewicz - M. Cieniewicz, 5.0, MA |
| NS |
5 | S | 3 | -2 |
-200 | 10.09 |
| 11 | 88: W. Makarewicz - M. Cieniewicz, 5.0, MA |
| NS |
3 | W | 5 | = |
-140 | 46.05 |
