1 | 87: M. Garlewicz - T. Chmielowiec, 7.0, PK |
1 | NS |
3 | S | A | -1 |
-50 | 59.43 |
1 | 87: M. Garlewicz - T. Chmielowiec, 7.0, PK |
2 | NS |
2 | N | 2 | +2 |
170 | 62.26 |
1 | 87: M. Garlewicz - T. Chmielowiec, 7.0, PK |
3 | NS |
1 | E | K | -1 |
100 | 76.41 |
1 | 87: M. Garlewicz - T. Chmielowiec, 7.0, PK |
4 | NS |
4 | N | 7 | -2 |
-200 | 3.79 |
1 | 87: M. Garlewicz - T. Chmielowiec, 7.0, PK |
5 | NS |
4 | E | 7 | +2 |
-480 | 13.22 |
1 | 87: M. Garlewicz - T. Chmielowiec, 7.0, PK |
6 | NS |
5 x | S | 2 | -4 |
-800 | 0.02 |
2 | 88: M. Naprawa - J. Gąsiorek, 2.5, -/PK |
7 | NS |
3 | S | 9 | = |
600 | 75.46 |
2 | 88: M. Naprawa - J. Gąsiorek, 2.5, -/PK |
8 | NS |
1 | S | 9 | +4 |
210 | 35.85 |
2 | 88: M. Naprawa - J. Gąsiorek, 2.5, -/PK |
9 | NS |
3 | W | 4 | -3 |
300 | 97.15 |
2 | 88: M. Naprawa - J. Gąsiorek, 2.5, -/PK |
10 | NS |
1 | S | 3 | +2 |
150 | 84.89 |
2 | 88: M. Naprawa - J. Gąsiorek, 2.5, -/PK |
11 | NS |
4 | W | J | = |
-420 | 48.11 |
2 | 88: M. Naprawa - J. Gąsiorek, 2.5, -/PK |
12 | NS |
3 | W | 8 | -5 |
250 | 92.44 |
3 | 85: W. Rusek - M. Rusek, 3.5, PK |
13 | EW |
6 | S | A | +1 |
1460 | 16.99 |
3 | 85: W. Rusek - M. Rusek, 3.5, PK |
14 | EW |
5 x | S | 5 | -1 |
-100 | 92.44 |
3 | 85: W. Rusek - M. Rusek, 3.5, PK |
15 | EW |
4 | S | 4 | +3 |
710 | 33.02 |
3 | 85: W. Rusek - M. Rusek, 3.5, PK |
16 | EW |
2 x | W | A | -1 |
200 | 24.54 |
3 | 85: W. Rusek - M. Rusek, 3.5, PK |
17 | EW |
3 | S | 8 | = |
110 | 27.37 |
3 | 85: W. Rusek - M. Rusek, 3.5, PK |
18 | EW |
4 | E | 2 | = |
-420 | 72.63 |
4 | 89: T. Wiechowski - H. Larwa, 0.0, |
19 | EW |
3 | E | 5 | -1 |
100 | 25.48 |
4 | 89: T. Wiechowski - H. Larwa, 0.0, |
20 | EW |
3 | S | 3 | +1 |
630 | 55.66 |
4 | 89: T. Wiechowski - H. Larwa, 0.0, |
21 | EW |
4 x | N | 8 | = |
790 | 2.92 |
4 | 89: T. Wiechowski - H. Larwa, 0.0, |
22 | EW |
3 | S | K | +1 |
430 | 12.04 |
4 | 89: T. Wiechowski - H. Larwa, 0.0, |
23 | EW |
4 | E | 7 | = |
-620 | 100.00 |
4 | 89: T. Wiechowski - H. Larwa, 0.0, |
24 | EW |
4 x | S | K | -2 |
-300 | 79.63 |