1 | 69: I. Turyk - Z. Gadek, 3.5, PD |
16 | EW |
4 | W | | +1 |
-650 | 71.25 |
1 | 69: I. Turyk - Z. Gadek, 3.5, PD |
17 | EW |
3 | S | | +2 |
460 | 47.50 |
1 | 69: I. Turyk - Z. Gadek, 3.5, PD |
18 | EW |
3 | S | | +1 |
630 | 50.00 |
2 | 65: K. Żuk - Z. Grabowiecki, 0.0, PD/- |
10 | EW |
4 | W | | -3 |
300 | 5.00 |
2 | 65: K. Żuk - Z. Grabowiecki, 0.0, PD/- |
11 | EW |
3 | W | | +1 |
-430 | 44.88 |
2 | 65: K. Żuk - Z. Grabowiecki, 0.0, PD/- |
12 | EW |
1 | W | | +1 |
-120 | 71.78 |
4 | 68: J. Ciulkin - M. Wysocki, 7.0, PD |
1 | EW |
1 | E | | = |
-90 | 70.00 |
4 | 68: J. Ciulkin - M. Wysocki, 7.0, PD |
2 | EW |
3 | S | | = |
140 | 7.50 |
4 | 68: J. Ciulkin - M. Wysocki, 7.0, PD |
3 | EW |
2 | N | | +2 |
170 | 7.50 |
5 | 72: H. Wojtkowska - D. Sterniczuk, 5.0, -/PD |
13 | EW |
5 | N | | -1 |
-100 | 53.94 |
5 | 72: H. Wojtkowska - D. Sterniczuk, 5.0, -/PD |
14 | EW |
6 | S | | +1 |
1010 | 25.00 |
5 | 72: H. Wojtkowska - D. Sterniczuk, 5.0, -/PD |
15 | EW |
4 | W | | -2 |
100 | 62.50 |
6 | 70: A. Błażewicz - J. Juchniewicz, 0.0, PD/- |
25 | NS |
2 | N | | +2 |
170 | 5.00 |
6 | 70: A. Błażewicz - J. Juchniewicz, 0.0, PD/- |
26 | NS |
3 | E | | -4 |
400 | 90.00 |
6 | 70: A. Błażewicz - J. Juchniewicz, 0.0, PD/- |
27 | NS |
2 | E | | = |
-110 | 51.65 |
7 | 71: B. Żukowski - L. Szubert, 0.0, PD/- |
22 | NS |
1 | S | | = |
90 | 83.75 |
7 | 71: B. Żukowski - L. Szubert, 0.0, PD/- |
23 | NS |
3 | S | | -1 |
-100 | 66.25 |
7 | 71: B. Żukowski - L. Szubert, 0.0, PD/- |
24 | NS |
4 | W | | +1 |
-450 | 51.28 |
8 | 59: T. Zalewski - W. Niewiński, 5.0, PD |
7 | NS |
6 | W | | -1 |
100 | 81.25 |
8 | 59: T. Zalewski - W. Niewiński, 5.0, PD |
8 | NS |
6 | S | | = |
980 | 96.25 |
8 | 59: T. Zalewski - W. Niewiński, 5.0, PD |
9 | NS |
5 x | S | | -4 |
-800 | 40.00 |
9 | 61: G. Kryszeń - K. Wasilewski, 0.5, PD/- |
4 | NS |
3 | S | | +1 |
170 | 76.25 |
9 | 61: G. Kryszeń - K. Wasilewski, 0.5, PD/- |
5 | NS |
3 | S | | +2 |
660 | 97.50 |
9 | 61: G. Kryszeń - K. Wasilewski, 0.5, PD/- |
6 | NS |
2 | E | | -1 |
100 | 35.00 |