| 1 | 50: T. Mediuch - B. Tomaszewski, 0.5, ZP/- |
1 | NS |
2  | S |  5 | +2 |
170 | 45.66 |
| 1 | 50: T. Mediuch - B. Tomaszewski, 0.5, ZP/- |
2 | NS |
3 x | S |  10 | = |
670 | 99.91 |
| 1 | 50: T. Mediuch - B. Tomaszewski, 0.5, ZP/- |
3 | NS |
5 x | S | A | +1 |
650 | 93.40 |
| 1 | 50: T. Mediuch - B. Tomaszewski, 0.5, ZP/- |
4 | NS |
3  | E | A | -1 |
100 | 62.50 |
| 1 | 50: T. Mediuch - B. Tomaszewski, 0.5, ZP/- |
5 | NS |
6  | S | K | = |
1440 | 97.55 |
| 1 | 50: T. Mediuch - B. Tomaszewski, 0.5, ZP/- |
6 | NS |
3 | W | 4 | -1 |
100 | 93.40 |
| 2 | 51: S. Kamiński - H. Pakuła, 9.0, ZP |
7 | NS |
4 | W | 2 | -2 |
200 | 82.55 |
| 2 | 51: S. Kamiński - H. Pakuła, 9.0, ZP |
8 | NS |
4 | W | 6 | +1 |
-450 | 50.00 |
| 2 | 51: S. Kamiński - H. Pakuła, 9.0, ZP |
9 | NS |
3 | W | 4 | -1 |
100 | 63.02 |
| 2 | 51: S. Kamiński - H. Pakuła, 9.0, ZP |
10 | NS |
3 | N | 7 | +1 |
630 | 99.91 |
| 2 | 51: S. Kamiński - H. Pakuła, 9.0, ZP |
11 | NS |
3 | S | 5 | -1 |
-50 | 56.51 |
| 2 | 51: S. Kamiński - H. Pakuła, 9.0, ZP |
12 | NS |
2 | N | K | +1 |
140 | 71.70 |
| 3 | 48: M. Silski - B. Wiliński, 0.0, |
13 | EW |
4 | N | Q | -1 |
-100 | 67.36 |
| 3 | 48: M. Silski - B. Wiliński, 0.0, |
14 | EW |
5 | S | K | +1 |
420 | 63.02 |
| 3 | 48: M. Silski - B. Wiliński, 0.0, |
15 | EW |
4 | N | K | -1 |
-100 | 63.02 |
| 3 | 48: M. Silski - B. Wiliński, 0.0, |
16 | EW |
2 x | E | A | -2 |
500 | 4.71 |
| 3 | 48: M. Silski - B. Wiliński, 0.0, |
17 | EW |
4 x | W | 9 | -3 |
500 | 10.94 |
| 3 | 48: M. Silski - B. Wiliński, 0.0, |
18 | EW |
3 | E | 5 | -2 |
100 | 18.30 |
| 4 | 52: E. Kaczmarek - M. Sankiewicz, 14.0, ZP |
19 | EW |
4 | S | 7 | -1 |
-50 | 91.23 |
| 4 | 52: E. Kaczmarek - M. Sankiewicz, 14.0, ZP |
20 | EW |
3 | S | 6 | +2 |
660 | 4.43 |
| 4 | 52: E. Kaczmarek - M. Sankiewicz, 14.0, ZP |
21 | EW |
6 | E | Q | = |
-990 | 82.55 |
| 4 | 52: E. Kaczmarek - M. Sankiewicz, 14.0, ZP |
22 | EW |
3 | S | 10 | = |
140 | 41.67 |
| 4 | 52: E. Kaczmarek - M. Sankiewicz, 14.0, ZP |
23 | EW |
3 | W | A | -1 |
100 | 41.67 |
| 4 | 52: E. Kaczmarek - M. Sankiewicz, 14.0, ZP |
24 | EW |
6 x | W | A | -3 |
500 | 4.17 |
| 5 | 47: A. Kondyjowska - Z. Kwiatkowski, 4.0, ZP/- |
25 | EW |
3 | W | 4 | = |
-110 | 68.75 |
| 5 | 47: A. Kondyjowska - Z. Kwiatkowski, 4.0, ZP/- |
26 | EW |
1 | E | A | +1 |
-120 | 87.50 |
| 5 | 47: A. Kondyjowska - Z. Kwiatkowski, 4.0, ZP/- |
27 | EW |
1 | E | 8 | -1 |
50 | 16.67 |
| 5 | 47: A. Kondyjowska - Z. Kwiatkowski, 4.0, ZP/- |
28 | EW |
2 | S | 8 | -1 |
-100 | 67.36 |
| 5 | 47: A. Kondyjowska - Z. Kwiatkowski, 4.0, ZP/- |
29 | EW |
4 | N | 8 | -1 |
-100 | 50.00 |
| 5 | 47: A. Kondyjowska - Z. Kwiatkowski, 4.0, ZP/- |
30 | EW |
1 | E | 9 | -2 |
100 | 17.45 |
