| 1 | 89: W. Fecko - J. Górka, 18.0, MP |
1 | NS |
6  | N | | +1 |
1020 | 97.29 |
| 1 | 89: W. Fecko - J. Górka, 18.0, MP |
2 | NS |
4  | N | | +1 |
650 | 85.42 |
| 1 | 89: W. Fecko - J. Górka, 18.0, MP |
3 | NS |
4 | N | | -1 |
-50 | 37.28 |
| 1 | 89: W. Fecko - J. Górka, 18.0, MP |
4 | NS |
4 | N | | -1 |
-100 | 21.84 |
| 1 | 89: W. Fecko - J. Górka, 18.0, MP |
5 | NS |
3 | E | | = |
-400 | 17.30 |
| 1 | 89: W. Fecko - J. Górka, 18.0, MP |
6 | NS |
3 | N | | = |
140 | 61.81 |
| 1 | 90: S. Waśko - M. Urbański, 22.0, MP/LB |
7 | NS |
2  | E | | +3 |
-200 | 79.45 |
| 1 | 90: S. Waśko - M. Urbański, 22.0, MP/LB |
8 | NS |
3  | E | | -1 |
50 | 73.20 |
| 1 | 90: S. Waśko - M. Urbański, 22.0, MP/LB |
9 | NS |
1 | N | | +1 |
120 | 34.22 |
| 1 | 90: S. Waśko - M. Urbański, 22.0, MP/LB |
10 | NS |
5 | N | | +1 |
680 | 40.35 |
| 1 | 90: S. Waśko - M. Urbański, 22.0, MP/LB |
11 | NS |
5 | E | | -2 |
100 | 84.20 |
| 1 | 90: S. Waśko - M. Urbański, 22.0, MP/LB |
12 | NS |
2 | E | | -1 |
50 | 35.09 |
| 1 | 91: R. Woliński - J. Zając, 23.0, MP |
13 | NS |
4 x | N | | -4 |
-1100 | 0.01 |
| 1 | 91: R. Woliński - J. Zając, 23.0, MP |
14 | NS |
4 | E | | +1 |
-450 | 44.74 |
| 1 | 91: R. Woliński - J. Zając, 23.0, MP |
15 | NS |
3 | N | | +1 |
170 | 94.72 |
| 1 | 91: R. Woliński - J. Zając, 23.0, MP |
16 | NS |
2 | E | | -3 |
300 | 89.26 |
| 1 | 91: R. Woliński - J. Zając, 23.0, MP |
17 | NS |
3 | N | | -1 |
-50 | 36.85 |
| 1 | 91: R. Woliński - J. Zając, 23.0, MP |
18 | NS |
4 | E | | = |
-420 | 19.31 |
| 1 | 92: J. Kłusek - R. Maceluch, 16.0, MP |
19 | NS |
2 | N | | -1 |
-50 | 58.77 |
| 1 | 92: J. Kłusek - R. Maceluch, 16.0, MP |
20 | NS |
5 x | E | | -1 |
200 | 92.97 |
| 1 | 92: J. Kłusek - R. Maceluch, 16.0, MP |
21 | NS |
6 x | E | | = |
-1210 | 2.65 |
| 1 | 92: J. Kłusek - R. Maceluch, 16.0, MP |
22 | NS |
3 | E | | = |
-600 | 24.14 |
| 1 | 92: J. Kłusek - R. Maceluch, 16.0, MP |
23 | NS |
1 | N | | = |
90 | 42.11 |
| 1 | 92: J. Kłusek - R. Maceluch, 16.0, MP |
24 | NS |
5 x | E | | -2 |
300 | 72.80 |
| 1 | 93: E. Cieśla - P. Turczynowicz, 4.0, MP |
25 | NS |
5  | N | | = |
400 | 92.09 |
| 1 | 93: E. Cieśla - P. Turczynowicz, 4.0, MP |
26 | NS |
3 | N | | +1 |
630 | 81.57 |
| 1 | 93: E. Cieśla - P. Turczynowicz, 4.0, MP |
27 | NS |
3 | E | | -2 |
100 | 30.93 |
| 1 | 93: E. Cieśla - P. Turczynowicz, 4.0, MP |
28 | NS |
2 | E | | +2 |
-170 | 71.33 |
| 1 | 93: E. Cieśla - P. Turczynowicz, 4.0, MP |
29 | NS |
3 | N | | +1 |
630 | 41.97 |
| 1 | 93: E. Cieśla - P. Turczynowicz, 4.0, MP |
30 | NS |
6 | E | | +1 |
-1020 | 25.91 |
