1 | 120: H. Pakuła - L. Sulżycki, 11.0, ZP |
1 | NS |
3 | E | 5 | -1 |
50 | 39.29 |
1 | 120: H. Pakuła - L. Sulżycki, 11.0, ZP |
2 | NS |
4 | W | A | -1 |
50 | 84.80 |
1 | 120: H. Pakuła - L. Sulżycki, 11.0, ZP |
3 | NS |
7 | N | 7 | = |
1520 | 76.77 |
1 | 120: H. Pakuła - L. Sulżycki, 11.0, ZP |
4 | NS |
5 | W | Q | -1 |
100 | 40.18 |
1 | 120: H. Pakuła - L. Sulżycki, 11.0, ZP |
5 | NS |
2 | S | 2 | -1 |
-100 | 67.85 |
1 | 120: H. Pakuła - L. Sulżycki, 11.0, ZP |
6 | NS |
4 | S | J | -1 |
-50 | 29.48 |
2 | 121: Z. Kwiatkowski - W. Glina, 0.0, |
7 | NS |
3 | E | 3 | -2 |
200 | 78.55 |
2 | 121: Z. Kwiatkowski - W. Glina, 0.0, |
8 | NS |
3 | S | 3 | +2 |
460 | 75.88 |
2 | 121: Z. Kwiatkowski - W. Glina, 0.0, |
9 | NS |
3 | W | 2 | +1 |
-630 | 40.18 |
2 | 121: Z. Kwiatkowski - W. Glina, 0.0, |
10 | NS |
3 | N | 2 | -2 |
-200 | 5.38 |
2 | 121: Z. Kwiatkowski - W. Glina, 0.0, |
11 | NS |
3 | W | J | = |
-140 | 30.37 |
2 | 121: Z. Kwiatkowski - W. Glina, 0.0, |
12 | NS |
3 | W | 8 | -1 |
50 | 83.02 |
3 | 118: B. Wiliński - K. Wiliński, 7.0, -/ZP |
13 | EW |
4 | S | A | = |
620 | 50.00 |
3 | 118: B. Wiliński - K. Wiliński, 7.0, -/ZP |
14 | EW |
2 | W | 3 | = |
-110 | 64.03 |
3 | 118: B. Wiliński - K. Wiliński, 7.0, -/ZP |
15 | EW |
3 | W | 5 | +1 |
-430 | 57.89 |
3 | 118: B. Wiliński - K. Wiliński, 7.0, -/ZP |
16 | EW |
4 | W | 4 | = |
-620 | 89.26 |
3 | 118: B. Wiliński - K. Wiliński, 7.0, -/ZP |
17 | EW |
2 | S | K | +2 |
170 | 9.85 |
3 | 118: B. Wiliński - K. Wiliński, 7.0, -/ZP |
18 | EW |
3 | N | 7 | +1 |
130 | 54.46 |
4 | 122: J. Antoniewicz - Z. Kondyjowski, 3.0, -/ZP |
19 | EW |
3 | S | J | -3 |
-150 | 83.02 |
4 | 122: J. Antoniewicz - Z. Kondyjowski, 3.0, -/ZP |
20 | EW |
3 | W | 5 | +2 |
-660 | 95.51 |
4 | 122: J. Antoniewicz - Z. Kondyjowski, 3.0, -/ZP |
21 | EW |
3 | E | 3 | -1 |
50 | 38.60 |
4 | 122: J. Antoniewicz - Z. Kondyjowski, 3.0, -/ZP |
22 | EW |
5 x | W | K | -2 |
500 | 2.59 |
4 | 122: J. Antoniewicz - Z. Kondyjowski, 3.0, -/ZP |
23 | EW |
2 | N | K | -2 |
-200 | 90.52 |
4 | 122: J. Antoniewicz - Z. Kondyjowski, 3.0, -/ZP |
24 | EW |
4 | E | 3 | = |
-420 | 56.03 |
5 | 117: M. Sankiewicz - B. Tomaszewski, 5.0, ZP/- |
25 | EW |
1 | N | K | +2 |
110 | 33.34 |
5 | 117: M. Sankiewicz - B. Tomaszewski, 5.0, ZP/- |
26 | EW |
5 | S | A | +1 |
680 | 46.49 |
5 | 117: M. Sankiewicz - B. Tomaszewski, 5.0, ZP/- |
27 | EW |
1 | W | A | = |
-90 | 85.74 |
5 | 117: M. Sankiewicz - B. Tomaszewski, 5.0, ZP/- |
28 | EW |
2 x | W | 7 | = |
-180 | 95.78 |
5 | 117: M. Sankiewicz - B. Tomaszewski, 5.0, ZP/- |
29 | EW |
6 | S | 6 | = |
1440 | 24.57 |
5 | 117: M. Sankiewicz - B. Tomaszewski, 5.0, ZP/- |
30 | EW |
4 | E | J | -1 |
50 | 41.52 |