1 | 92: E. Kaczmarek - C. Wojtaś, 14.0, ZP |
6 | NS |
5 | W | Q | = |
-600 | 51.19 |
1 | 92: E. Kaczmarek - C. Wojtaś, 14.0, ZP |
7 | NS |
2 | N | K | +1 |
140 | 55.81 |
1 | 92: E. Kaczmarek - C. Wojtaś, 14.0, ZP |
8 | NS |
3 | S | 4 | = |
110 | 55.81 |
1 | 92: E. Kaczmarek - C. Wojtaś, 14.0, ZP |
9 | NS |
4 | N | Q | -1 |
-50 | 30.24 |
1 | 92: E. Kaczmarek - C. Wojtaś, 14.0, ZP |
10 | NS |
3 | E | 4 | = |
-140 | 36.05 |
2 | 94: W. Glina - Z. Kwiatkowski, 0.0, |
11 | EW |
3 | S | 7 | = |
400 | 82.54 |
2 | 94: W. Glina - Z. Kwiatkowski, 0.0, |
12 | EW |
3 | S | 5 | -2 |
-200 | 63.95 |
2 | 94: W. Glina - Z. Kwiatkowski, 0.0, |
13 | EW |
4 | N | 8 | = |
620 | 41.68 |
2 | 94: W. Glina - Z. Kwiatkowski, 0.0, |
14 | EW |
4 | E | 4 | +3 |
-510 | 41.48 |
2 | 89: E. Kozak - M. Silski, 1.5, ZP/- |
27 | NS |
1 | S | 2 | = |
80 | 54.04 |
2 | 89: E. Kozak - M. Silski, 1.5, ZP/- |
28 | NS |
2 | E | 8 | = |
-110 | 63.34 |
2 | 89: E. Kozak - M. Silski, 1.5, ZP/- |
29 | NS |
4 | W | A | = |
-620 | 93.06 |
2 | 89: E. Kozak - M. Silski, 1.5, ZP/- |
30 | NS |
5 | E | A | +1 |
-480 | 63.46 |
3 | 91: E. Chodźko - B. Wiliński, 0.0, |
23 | NS |
3 | E | 4 | +1 |
-130 | 58.14 |
3 | 91: E. Chodźko - B. Wiliński, 0.0, |
24 | NS |
3 | S | 4 | +1 |
430 | 72.08 |
3 | 91: E. Chodźko - B. Wiliński, 0.0, |
25 | NS |
3 | E | T | -1 |
100 | 61.36 |
4 | 91: E. Chodźko - B. Wiliński, 0.0, |
26 | NS |
1 | E | 2 | -1 |
100 | 78.41 |
5 | 96: M. Sankiewicz - B. Tomaszewski, 5.0, ZP/- |
21 | EW |
5 x | W | A | -3 |
500 | 57.14 |
5 | 96: M. Sankiewicz - B. Tomaszewski, 5.0, ZP/- |
22 | EW |
4 x | S | A | -2 |
-300 | 88.35 |
6 | 95: A. Kondyjowska - J. Antoniewicz, 4.0, ZP/- |
1 | EW |
4 | E | J | +1 |
-150 | 80.92 |
6 | 95: A. Kondyjowska - J. Antoniewicz, 4.0, ZP/- |
2 | EW |
3 | W | A | = |
-140 | 74.97 |
6 | 95: A. Kondyjowska - J. Antoniewicz, 4.0, ZP/- |
3 | EW |
4 x | W | 3 | = |
-790 | 97.57 |
6 | 95: A. Kondyjowska - J. Antoniewicz, 4.0, ZP/- |
4 | EW |
6 | E | J | +1 |
-1470 | 92.81 |
6 | 95: A. Kondyjowska - J. Antoniewicz, 4.0, ZP/- |
5 | EW |
4 | E | 7 | +1 |
-450 | 58.52 |
6 | 90: J. Jermakowicz - H. Pakuła, 4.0, -/ZP |
15 | EW |
3 | W | K | -2 |
100 | 30.97 |
7 | 90: J. Jermakowicz - H. Pakuła, 4.0, -/ZP |
16 | EW |
3 | W | 4 | = |
-600 | 62.18 |
7 | 90: J. Jermakowicz - H. Pakuła, 4.0, -/ZP |
17 | EW |
1 | E | 7 | +1 |
-120 | 88.05 |
7 | 90: J. Jermakowicz - H. Pakuła, 4.0, -/ZP |
18 | EW |
4 | E | 7 | +1 |
-450 | 66.15 |
7 | 96: M. Sankiewicz - B. Tomaszewski, 5.0, ZP/- |
19 | EW |
3 x | N | A | -3 |
-500 | 40.49 |
7 | 96: M. Sankiewicz - B. Tomaszewski, 5.0, ZP/- |
20 | EW |
4 | N | J | +2 |
680 | 83.30 |