| 1 | 69: E. Kaczmarek - M. Żakowicz, 21.0, ZP |
1 | EW |
4  | W | A | -1 |
50 | 71.19 |
| 1 | 69: E. Kaczmarek - M. Żakowicz, 21.0, ZP |
2 | EW |
1  | N | 5 | = |
90 | 59.08 |
| 1 | 69: E. Kaczmarek - M. Żakowicz, 21.0, ZP |
3 | EW |
3  | W | K | +1 |
-170 | 56.06 |
| 1 | 69: E. Kaczmarek - M. Żakowicz, 21.0, ZP |
4 | EW |
4  | S | A | = |
620 | 22.75 |
| 1 | 69: E. Kaczmarek - M. Żakowicz, 21.0, ZP |
5 | EW |
3  | N | 3 | +3 |
690 | 21.24 |
| 1 | 69: E. Kaczmarek - M. Żakowicz, 21.0, ZP |
6 | EW |
4  | E | A | -1 |
100 | 25.78 |
| 2 | 67: B. Tomaszewski - Z. Kondyjowski, 3.0, -/ZP |
7 | EW |
6 x | W | A | -2 |
500 | 1.56 |
| 2 | 67: B. Tomaszewski - Z. Kondyjowski, 3.0, -/ZP |
8 | EW |
4  | S | 5 | +1 |
450 | 16.70 |
| 2 | 67: B. Tomaszewski - Z. Kondyjowski, 3.0, -/ZP |
9 | EW |
6 x | N | Q | -1 |
-100 | 93.90 |
| 2 | 67: B. Tomaszewski - Z. Kondyjowski, 3.0, -/ZP |
10 | EW |
1  | W | 5 | = |
-90 | 51.51 |
| 2 | 67: B. Tomaszewski - Z. Kondyjowski, 3.0, -/ZP |
11 | EW |
3  | S | A | = |
140 | 19.72 |
| 2 | 67: B. Tomaszewski - Z. Kondyjowski, 3.0, -/ZP |
12 | EW |
4 x | W | A | -3 |
500 | 10.64 |
| 3 | 71: W. Jackowski - E. Chodźko, 4.0, ZP/- |
13 | NS |
2  | N | A | -1 |
-100 | 53.03 |
| 3 | 71: W. Jackowski - E. Chodźko, 4.0, ZP/- |
14 | NS |
2  | S | 3 | +1 |
110 | 60.60 |
| 3 | 71: W. Jackowski - E. Chodźko, 4.0, ZP/- |
15 | NS |
6  | N | A | = |
1370 | 96.93 |
| 3 | 71: W. Jackowski - E. Chodźko, 4.0, ZP/- |
16 | NS |
6  | W | Q | -2 |
200 | 98.44 |
| 3 | 71: W. Jackowski - E. Chodźko, 4.0, ZP/- |
17 | NS |
4  | W | A | -1 |
50 | 37.89 |
| 3 | 71: W. Jackowski - E. Chodźko, 4.0, ZP/- |
18 | NS |
4  | E | 3 | -1 |
50 | 80.28 |
| 4 | 68: J. Antoniewicz - Z. Kwiatkowski, 0.0, |
19 | NS |
4  | N | T | +2 |
480 | 87.85 |
| 4 | 68: J. Antoniewicz - Z. Kwiatkowski, 0.0, |
20 | NS |
4  | E | 5 | +2 |
-680 | 3.07 |
| 4 | 68: J. Antoniewicz - Z. Kwiatkowski, 0.0, |
21 | NS |
4  | W | A | -2 |
100 | 81.79 |
| 4 | 68: J. Antoniewicz - Z. Kwiatkowski, 0.0, |
22 | NS |
3  | N | 2 | -1 |
-50 | 30.32 |
| 4 | 68: J. Antoniewicz - Z. Kwiatkowski, 0.0, |
23 | NS |
2  | N | 8 | -2 |
-200 | 19.72 |
| 4 | 68: J. Antoniewicz - Z. Kwiatkowski, 0.0, |
24 | NS |
3  | W | T | = |
-400 | 25.00 |
| 5 | 72: W. Glina - B. Wiliński, 0.0, |
25 | EW |
2  | W | J | -1 |
100 | 66.18 |
| 5 | 72: W. Glina - B. Wiliński, 0.0, |
26 | EW |
4  | S | Q | -1 |
-100 | 55.88 |
| 5 | 72: W. Glina - B. Wiliński, 0.0, |
27 | EW |
3  | S | A | +2 |
150 | 57.35 |
| 5 | 72: W. Glina - B. Wiliński, 0.0, |
28 | EW |
1  | E | 6 | = |
-90 | 59.80 |
| 5 | 72: W. Glina - B. Wiliński, 0.0, |
29 | EW |
1  | W | 5 | = |
-90 | 70.00 |
| 5 | 72: W. Glina - B. Wiliński, 0.0, |
30 | EW |
2  | N | A | +1 |
110 | 60.00 |