| 1 | 87: B. Kubik - J. Hołdan, 0.0, |
| NS |
4  | N | 4 | -1 |
-100 | 25.53 |
| 1 | 87: B. Kubik - J. Hołdan, 0.0, |
| NS |
4  | W | K | -3 |
150 | 90.43 |
| 1 | 87: B. Kubik - J. Hołdan, 0.0, |
| NS |
2  | E | 6 | +1 |
-150 | 46.81 |
| 2 | 84: T. Chmielowiec - J. Turecki, 7.0, PK |
| NS |
2 x | E | K | -2 |
500 | 85.11 |
| 2 | 84: T. Chmielowiec - J. Turecki, 7.0, PK |
| NS |
3  | W | 6 | +1 |
-130 | 72.34 |
| 2 | 84: T. Chmielowiec - J. Turecki, 7.0, PK |
| NS |
PASS | N | | = |
0 | 41.49 |
| 3 | 82: I. Klar - J. Matelowski, 5.5, PK |
| NS |
1  | S | K | = |
90 | 63.83 |
| 3 | 82: I. Klar - J. Matelowski, 5.5, PK |
| NS |
3  | E | K | = |
-140 | 7.45 |
| 3 | 82: I. Klar - J. Matelowski, 5.5, PK |
| NS |
3  | S | 7 | -2 |
-200 | 28.72 |
| 4 | 91: J. Warchoł - M. Cisło, 2.5, PK/- |
| NS |
3  | W | 4 | -1 |
100 | 73.40 |
| 4 | 91: J. Warchoł - M. Cisło, 2.5, PK/- |
| NS |
4  | E | 4 | +1 |
-450 | 89.36 |
| 4 | 91: J. Warchoł - M. Cisło, 2.5, PK/- |
| NS |
3  | W | J | +3 |
-490 | 41.49 |
| 5 | 85: M. Naprawa - J. Gąsiorek, 2.5, -/PK |
| NS |
4 x | S | K | -3 |
-500 | 3.19 |
| 5 | 85: M. Naprawa - J. Gąsiorek, 2.5, -/PK |
| NS |
6  | W | K | -2 |
200 | 99.98 |
| 5 | 85: M. Naprawa - J. Gąsiorek, 2.5, -/PK |
| NS |
5 xx | N | J | = |
1000 | 57.45 |
| 6 | 90: D. Smulski - Z. Szczudło, 5.5, PK |
| NS |
5  | E | K | = |
-650 | 27.66 |
| 6 | 90: D. Smulski - Z. Szczudło, 5.5, PK |
| NS |
2  | S | 9 | = |
110 | 45.74 |
| 6 | 90: D. Smulski - Z. Szczudło, 5.5, PK |
| NS |
4  | S | 7 | -1 |
-50 | 24.47 |
| 7 | 83: Z. Wilisowski - T. Urbanek, 10.0, PK |
| NS |
4 x | S | 3 | -2 |
-300 | 24.47 |
| 7 | 83: Z. Wilisowski - T. Urbanek, 10.0, PK |
| NS |
3  | N | 2 | -1 |
-100 | 23.40 |
| 7 | 83: Z. Wilisowski - T. Urbanek, 10.0, PK |
| NS |
4  | S | A | = |
420 | 82.73 |
| 8 | 88: H. Larwa - T. Wiechowski, 0.0, |
| NS |
3  | N | 6 | +3 |
490 | 64.89 |
| 8 | 88: H. Larwa - T. Wiechowski, 0.0, |
| NS |
6  | N | 9 | +1 |
1460 | 100.00 |
| 8 | 88: H. Larwa - T. Wiechowski, 0.0, |
| NS |
3  | N | 5 | = |
140 | 45.65 |
| 9 | 89: Z. Żuber - M. Rusek, 6.0, PK |
| NS |
4 x | E | K | -2 |
500 | 91.29 |
| 9 | 89: Z. Żuber - M. Rusek, 6.0, PK |
| NS |
6  | N | A | = |
1430 | 89.11 |
| 9 | 89: Z. Żuber - M. Rusek, 6.0, PK |
| NS |
4  | W | A | -1 |
100 | 64.12 |