| 1 | 127: J. Matelowski - Z. Nykiel, 2.0, PK/NZ |
| NS |
2  | E |  Q | -1 |
100 | 59.74 |
| 1 | 127: J. Matelowski - Z. Nykiel, 2.0, PK/NZ |
| NS |
3 | S | 3 | +1 |
430 | 67.53 |
| 1 | 127: J. Matelowski - Z. Nykiel, 2.0, PK/NZ |
| NS |
2 x | N |  9 | -2 |
-500 | 5.19 |
| 2 | 122: R. Jackowski - B. Ortyl, 2.5, PK/- |
| EW |
3 | E |  10 | = |
-600 | 63.33 |
| 2 | 122: R. Jackowski - B. Ortyl, 2.5, PK/- |
| EW |
1 | E | 2 | +1 |
-120 | 54.60 |
| 2 | 122: R. Jackowski - B. Ortyl, 2.5, PK/- |
| EW |
1 | E | 3 | +1 |
-120 | 29.22 |
| 3 | 124: S. Malinowski - Z. Wilisowski, 8.0, PK |
| NS |
3 | W | 6 | -1 |
100 | 50.65 |
| 3 | 124: S. Malinowski - Z. Wilisowski, 8.0, PK |
| NS |
3 | E | 6 | = |
-600 | 77.27 |
| 3 | 124: S. Malinowski - Z. Wilisowski, 8.0, PK |
| NS |
2  | E | 10 | = |
-90 | 18.94 |
| 4 | 123: D. Smulski - T. Urbanek, 6.0, PK |
| EW |
6 | W | Q | -1 |
100 | 3.25 |
| 4 | 123: D. Smulski - T. Urbanek, 6.0, PK |
| EW |
6 | N | 6 | = |
990 | 33.12 |
| 4 | 123: D. Smulski - T. Urbanek, 6.0, PK |
| EW |
4 | E | A | -4 |
200 | 14.48 |
| 5 | 119: B. Mycielski - J. Warchoł, 6.0, PK |
| EW |
3 | S | 2 | +1 |
430 | 25.05 |
| 5 | 119: B. Mycielski - J. Warchoł, 6.0, PK |
| EW |
6 x | S | A | -4 |
-1100 | 99.89 |
| 5 | 119: B. Mycielski - J. Warchoł, 6.0, PK |
| EW |
3 | N | J | +1 |
430 | 23.41 |
| 6 | 121: B. Sygulski - B. Rojkowicz, 6.5, PK |
| NS |
3 | W | K | +1 |
-170 | 29.22 |
| 6 | 121: B. Sygulski - B. Rojkowicz, 6.5, PK |
| NS |
1 | N | 6 | +2 |
140 | 64.29 |
| 6 | 121: B. Sygulski - B. Rojkowicz, 6.5, PK |
| NS |
6 | E | 5 | = |
-920 | 12.99 |
| 7 | 120: J. Lipior - T. Mazur, 5.5, PK |
| NS |
1 | E | 10 | +2 |
-150 | 4.08 |
| 7 | 120: J. Lipior - T. Mazur, 5.5, PK |
| NS |
5 | W | K | +1 |
-620 | 45.46 |
| 7 | 120: J. Lipior - T. Mazur, 5.5, PK |
| NS |
3 | N | 10 | +2 |
150 | 58.32 |
| 8 | 128: E. Osiński - L. Garbacik, 6.5, PK |
| EW |
5 | N | A | -1 |
-50 | 86.36 |
| 8 | 128: E. Osiński - L. Garbacik, 6.5, PK |
| EW |
4 | S | A | = |
620 | 17.53 |
| 8 | 128: E. Osiński - L. Garbacik, 6.5, PK |
| EW |
3 | E | 5 | -1 |
100 | 9.35 |
| 9 | 125: Z. Kozioł - A. Stasiński, 6.5, PK |
| EW |
2 | N | 8 | +1 |
140 | 38.96 |
| 9 | 125: Z. Kozioł - A. Stasiński, 6.5, PK |
| EW |
2 x | N | A | = |
470 | 5.19 |
| 9 | 125: Z. Kozioł - A. Stasiński, 6.5, PK |
| EW |
2 | S | J | -1 |
-50 | 81.57 |
