| 1 | 123: A. Makarewicz - M. Wierzbicki, 0.0, MA |
| EW |
4  | E |  10 | +3 |
-510 | 44.15 |
| 1 | 123: A. Makarewicz - M. Wierzbicki, 0.0, MA |
| EW |
3 | W |  K | = |
-140 | 64.03 |
| 1 | 123: A. Makarewicz - M. Wierzbicki, 0.0, MA |
| EW |
2 | N |  Q | -3 |
-150 | 83.92 |
| 1 | 123: A. Makarewicz - M. Wierzbicki, 0.0, MA |
| EW |
4 | W | 2 | -2 |
200 | 79.53 |
| 1 | 123: A. Makarewicz - M. Wierzbicki, 0.0, MA |
| EW |
2  | W | 7 | +4 |
-240 | 83.62 |
| 1 | 123: A. Makarewicz - M. Wierzbicki, 0.0, MA |
| EW |
4 | N | A | = |
420 | 11.11 |
| 2 | 121: A. Andrejczyk - G. Andrejczyk, 5.0, MA |
| EW |
2 | W | 6 | +1 |
-140 | 81.06 |
| 2 | 121: A. Andrejczyk - G. Andrejczyk, 5.0, MA |
| EW |
4 | W | 5 | +2 |
-480 | 69.12 |
| 2 | 121: A. Andrejczyk - G. Andrejczyk, 5.0, MA |
| EW |
1 | E | 6 | +1 |
-110 | 58.48 |
| 2 | 121: A. Andrejczyk - G. Andrejczyk, 5.0, MA |
| EW |
3 | W | 3 | -2 |
200 | 8.53 |
| 2 | 121: A. Andrejczyk - G. Andrejczyk, 5.0, MA |
| EW |
3 | N | K | -1 |
-50 | 55.59 |
| 2 | 121: A. Andrejczyk - G. Andrejczyk, 5.0, MA |
| EW |
3 | N | K | +1 |
630 | 31.77 |
| 3 | 125: J. Cichowski - J. Pałysa, 3.0, MA |
| NS |
4 | N | Q | +1 |
650 | 49.12 |
| 3 | 125: J. Cichowski - J. Pałysa, 3.0, MA |
| NS |
2 | W | K | -1 |
50 | 80.41 |
| 3 | 125: J. Cichowski - J. Pałysa, 3.0, MA |
| NS |
2 | S | 10 | = |
90 | 89.18 |
| 3 | 125: J. Cichowski - J. Pałysa, 3.0, MA |
| NS |
3 | S | A | = |
140 | 65.50 |
| 3 | 125: J. Cichowski - J. Pałysa, 3.0, MA |
| NS |
3 | N | 7 | +2 |
460 | 88.89 |
| 3 | 125: J. Cichowski - J. Pałysa, 3.0, MA |
| NS |
3 | S | 4 | = |
140 | 86.05 |
| 4 | 122: A. Mazur - J. Milewski, 2.5, MA |
| NS |
2 | S | Q | +1 |
140 | 68.53 |
| 4 | 122: A. Mazur - J. Milewski, 2.5, MA |
| NS |
3 | S | W | +1 |
170 | 21.22 |
| 4 | 122: A. Mazur - J. Milewski, 2.5, MA |
| NS |
3 | W | 6 | = |
-400 | 70.35 |
| 4 | 122: A. Mazur - J. Milewski, 2.5, MA |
| NS |
3 | N | 4 | -1 |
-50 | 78.65 |
| 4 | 122: A. Mazur - J. Milewski, 2.5, MA |
| NS |
3 | W | K | = |
-140 | 16.38 |
| 4 | 122: A. Mazur - J. Milewski, 2.5, MA |
| NS |
3 | W | 4 | -1 |
50 | 52.94 |
| 5 | 126: J. Oleksiak - W. Surmacz, 2.0, MA |
| EW |
4 x | S | 9 | -4 |
-800 | 99.99 |
| 5 | 126: J. Oleksiak - W. Surmacz, 2.0, MA |
| EW |
4 | N | 10 | = |
620 | 35.63 |
| 5 | 126: J. Oleksiak - W. Surmacz, 2.0, MA |
| EW |
1 | E | 4 | +2 |
-150 | 70.56 |
| 5 | 126: J. Oleksiak - W. Surmacz, 2.0, MA |
| EW |
4 | N | 7 | = |
130 | 64.70 |
| 5 | 126: J. Oleksiak - W. Surmacz, 2.0, MA |
| EW |
2 x | S | A | -3 |
-800 | 86.58 |
| 5 | 126: J. Oleksiak - W. Surmacz, 2.0, MA |
| EW |
4 | S | A | -1 |
-50 | 91.15 |
