| 1 | 60: E. Aranowski - A. Chrzanowski, 9.0, MA |
| EW |
3  | W |  K | +1 |
-130 | 63.41 |
| 1 | 60: E. Aranowski - A. Chrzanowski, 9.0, MA |
| EW |
1  | W | 3 | +1 |
-120 | 79.27 |
| 1 | 60: E. Aranowski - A. Chrzanowski, 9.0, MA |
| EW |
3 | N |  6 | +1 |
430 | 1.22 |
| 1 | 60: E. Aranowski - A. Chrzanowski, 9.0, MA |
| EW |
4 | S | A | = |
620 | 18.29 |
| 1 | 60: E. Aranowski - A. Chrzanowski, 9.0, MA |
| EW |
2 | N | 5 | +1 |
140 | 53.66 |
| 1 | 60: E. Aranowski - A. Chrzanowski, 9.0, MA |
| EW |
4 | W |  K | = |
-620 | 43.90 |
| 2 | 62: R. Andrzej - I. Kos, 3.0, MA |
| NS |
4 | E | 5 | = |
-620 | 80.49 |
| 2 | 62: R. Andrzej - I. Kos, 3.0, MA |
| NS |
6 | S | 4 | -1 |
-50 | 35.37 |
| 2 | 62: R. Andrzej - I. Kos, 3.0, MA |
| NS |
2 | E | 10 | -1 |
100 | 97.28 |
| 2 | 62: R. Andrzej - I. Kos, 3.0, MA |
| NS |
3 | E | 2 | -2 |
200 | 92.68 |
| 2 | 62: R. Andrzej - I. Kos, 3.0, MA |
| NS |
5 x | N | A | -3 |
-500 | 23.17 |
| 2 | 62: R. Andrzej - I. Kos, 3.0, MA |
| NS |
2 | N | 3 | +2 |
130 | 84.15 |
| 3 | 59: M. Kalinowski - H. Misiarz, 4.0, MA |
| NS |
4 | E | Q | -1 |
100 | 90.24 |
| 3 | 59: M. Kalinowski - H. Misiarz, 4.0, MA |
| NS |
1 | N | 2 | +1 |
120 | 86.59 |
| 3 | 59: M. Kalinowski - H. Misiarz, 4.0, MA |
| NS |
3 | N | Q | +2 |
660 | 98.78 |
| 3 | 59: M. Kalinowski - H. Misiarz, 4.0, MA |
| NS |
4 | W | 2 | = |
-620 | 2.44 |
| 3 | 59: M. Kalinowski - H. Misiarz, 4.0, MA |
| NS |
3 | N | 4 | = |
400 | 40.24 |
| 3 | 59: M. Kalinowski - H. Misiarz, 4.0, MA |
| NS |
6 | E | 7 | +1 |
-1010 | 2.53 |
| 5 | 58: J. Kawczyński - A. Ejnik, 10.0, MA |
| EW |
4 x | N | A | -1 |
-100 | 63.56 |
| 5 | 58: J. Kawczyński - A. Ejnik, 10.0, MA |
| EW |
2 x | E | Q | -1 |
200 | 16.86 |
| 5 | 58: J. Kawczyński - A. Ejnik, 10.0, MA |
| EW |
6 | S | Q | -1 |
-50 | 90.98 |
| 5 | 58: J. Kawczyński - A. Ejnik, 10.0, MA |
| EW |
3 | S | J | = |
600 | 53.20 |
| 5 | 58: J. Kawczyński - A. Ejnik, 10.0, MA |
| EW |
1 | N | Q | +2 |
140 | 46.80 |
| 5 | 58: J. Kawczyński - A. Ejnik, 10.0, MA |
| EW |
3 | N | 5 | = |
110 | 1.98 |
