1 | 92: S. Grabowski - M. Rutkowski, 8.0, MA |
| EW |
4 x | S | | -3 |
-500 | 84.82 |
1 | 92: S. Grabowski - M. Rutkowski, 8.0, MA |
| EW |
2 | W | | +3 |
-200 | 30.80 |
1 | 92: S. Grabowski - M. Rutkowski, 8.0, MA |
| EW |
3 | S | | -1 |
-50 | 71.62 |
1 | 92: S. Grabowski - M. Rutkowski, 8.0, MA |
| EW |
3 | E | | -1 |
50 | 21.62 |
1 | 90: W. Adamkiewicz - J. Domański, 4.5, MA |
| NS |
5 | N | | = |
650 | 92.04 |
1 | 90: W. Adamkiewicz - J. Domański, 4.5, MA |
| NS |
4 | E | | = |
-620 | 85.97 |
1 | 90: W. Adamkiewicz - J. Domański, 4.5, MA |
| NS |
5 | N | | -1 |
-50 | 0.49 |
2 | 91: A. Niewiadomski - H. Ślesicki, 8.0, MA/WP |
| EW |
6 | S | | = |
980 | 22.98 |
2 | 91: A. Niewiadomski - H. Ślesicki, 8.0, MA/WP |
| EW |
| | | |
0 | 40.09 |
2 | 91: A. Niewiadomski - H. Ślesicki, 8.0, MA/WP |
| EW |
2 | N | | -1 |
-50 | 67.41 |
2 | 91: A. Niewiadomski - H. Ślesicki, 8.0, MA/WP |
| EW |
3 x | W | | = |
-730 | 99.11 |
2 | 84: W. Surmacz - J. Krzykowski, 1.0, MA |
| NS |
3 | W | | -1 |
50 | 86.61 |
2 | 84: W. Surmacz - J. Krzykowski, 1.0, MA |
| NS |
4 | S | | +1 |
450 | 92.41 |
2 | 84: W. Surmacz - J. Krzykowski, 1.0, MA |
| NS |
3 | S | | +1 |
630 | 69.37 |
2 | 84: W. Surmacz - J. Krzykowski, 1.0, MA |
| NS |
4 | S | | -1 |
-50 | 39.29 |
3 | 85: S. Grędziński - A. Karczmarz, 8.0, MA |
| EW |
3 x | N | | -1 |
-200 | 97.32 |
3 | 85: S. Grędziński - A. Karczmarz, 8.0, MA |
| EW |
3 | W | | -1 |
100 | 18.47 |
3 | 85: S. Grędziński - A. Karczmarz, 8.0, MA |
| EW |
3 | W | | -2 |
200 | 37.95 |
3 | 85: S. Grędziński - A. Karczmarz, 8.0, MA |
| EW |
4 | E | | +1 |
-450 | 62.61 |
4 | 88: J. Malisiewicz - M. Stryczyński, 4.0, SW/MA |
| EW |
5 | N | | -1 |
-100 | 35.27 |
4 | 88: J. Malisiewicz - M. Stryczyński, 4.0, SW/MA |
| EW |
3 | N | | +1 |
430 | 31.70 |
4 | 88: J. Malisiewicz - M. Stryczyński, 4.0, SW/MA |
| EW |
TD | | | |
| 40.00 |
4 | 88: J. Malisiewicz - M. Stryczyński, 4.0, SW/MA |
| EW |
3 | W | | = |
-140 | 22.98 |
4 | 89: D. Biedrzycki - W. Palmowski, 11.0, MA |
| EW |
3 | W | | +3 |
-170 | 33.04 |
4 | 89: D. Biedrzycki - W. Palmowski, 11.0, MA |
| EW |
1 | E | | = |
-90 | 48.65 |
4 | 89: D. Biedrzycki - W. Palmowski, 11.0, MA |
| EW |
2 x | E | | -4 |
800 | 11.61 |
5 | 86: G. Andrejczyk - J. Plichtowicz, 1.5, MA |
| NS |
3 x | N | | -4 |
-800 | 0.45 |
5 | 86: G. Andrejczyk - J. Plichtowicz, 1.5, MA |
| NS |
4 | N | | +1 |
650 | 88.63 |
5 | 86: G. Andrejczyk - J. Plichtowicz, 1.5, MA |
| NS |
| | | |
0 | 67.86 |
5 | 86: G. Andrejczyk - J. Plichtowicz, 1.5, MA |
| NS |
6 | N | | +1 |
1460 | 70.72 |
5 | 87: B. Jaskulski - J. Sadowski, 4.0, MA |
| NS |
4 | W | | +3 |
-510 | 0.00 |
5 | 87: B. Jaskulski - J. Sadowski, 4.0, MA |
| NS |
1 | S | | +2 |
150 | 45.98 |
5 | 87: B. Jaskulski - J. Sadowski, 4.0, MA |
| NS |
3 | S | | = |
140 | 65.76 |