| 1 | 32: M. Jefremienko - W. Rutkowski, 4.0, -/MA |
| EW |
3  | N |  A | -1 |
-50 | 19.70 |
| 1 | 32: M. Jefremienko - W. Rutkowski, 4.0, -/MA |
| EW |
4 | W | A | -1 |
100 | 48.48 |
| 1 | 32: M. Jefremienko - W. Rutkowski, 4.0, -/MA |
| EW |
3  | E | 7 | +1 |
-430 | 96.97 |
| 1 | 32: M. Jefremienko - W. Rutkowski, 4.0, -/MA |
| EW |
1 | W | K | +2 |
-140 | 42.42 |
| 2 | 31: J. Pietrzak - J. Tomaszczuk, 7.0, MA |
| EW |
2 | W |  Q | -1 |
50 | 51.52 |
| 2 | 31: J. Pietrzak - J. Tomaszczuk, 7.0, MA |
| EW |
3 | E | A | -3 |
300 | 3.17 |
| 2 | 31: J. Pietrzak - J. Tomaszczuk, 7.0, MA |
| EW |
1 | E | 5 | = |
-90 | 90.59 |
| 2 | 31: J. Pietrzak - J. Tomaszczuk, 7.0, MA |
| EW |
4 | E | 3 | = |
-420 | 62.88 |
| 3 | 35: D. Wacławek - R. Michalski, 5.0, MA |
| NS |
2  | E | Q | +2 |
-130 | 29.07 |
| 3 | 35: D. Wacławek - R. Michalski, 5.0, MA |
| NS |
4 | E | 8 | +2 |
-480 | 39.07 |
| 3 | 35: D. Wacławek - R. Michalski, 5.0, MA |
| NS |
3 | N | K | = |
600 | 50.00 |
| 3 | 35: D. Wacławek - R. Michalski, 5.0, MA |
| NS |
2 | W | A | +2 |
-170 | 37.51 |
| 4 | 29: R. Siedlecki - R. Sadowski, 10.0, MA |
| EW |
3 x | E | K | +1 |
-630 | 96.83 |
| 4 | 29: R. Siedlecki - R. Sadowski, 10.0, MA |
| EW |
4 | S | Q | -1 |
-100 | 21.90 |
| 4 | 29: R. Siedlecki - R. Sadowski, 10.0, MA |
| EW |
3 | E | 6 | +1 |
-630 | 67.17 |
| 4 | 29: R. Siedlecki - R. Sadowski, 10.0, MA |
| EW |
1 | E | 6 | -1 |
100 | 17.22 |
| 5 | 34: W. Kostrzewa - J. Koter, 8.0, MA |
| NS |
3 | N | 8 | +2 |
660 | 80.30 |
| 5 | 34: W. Kostrzewa - J. Koter, 8.0, MA |
| NS |
4 | S | A | +1 |
450 | 39.39 |
| 5 | 34: W. Kostrzewa - J. Koter, 8.0, MA |
| NS |
2 | E | 5 | = |
-120 | 27.27 |
| 5 | 34: W. Kostrzewa - J. Koter, 8.0, MA |
| NS |
2 | W | K | +2 |
-130 | 30.30 |
| 6 | 30: I. Ziółkowska - A. Ziółkowski, 0.5, MA |
| NS |
3 | W | 3 | = |
-140 | 37.51 |
| 6 | 30: I. Ziółkowska - A. Ziółkowski, 0.5, MA |
| NS |
4 | W | A | = |
-420 | 37.51 |
| 6 | 30: I. Ziółkowska - A. Ziółkowski, 0.5, MA |
| NS |
2 x | E | K | -2 |
500 | 99.95 |
| 6 | 30: I. Ziółkowska - A. Ziółkowski, 0.5, MA |
| NS |
1 | E | 2 | -1 |
100 | 34.39 |
| 7 | 28: T. Mikołajczyk - T. Pawlak, 6.0, MA |
| EW |
3 | S | 3 | = |
400 | 71.21 |
| 7 | 28: T. Mikołajczyk - T. Pawlak, 6.0, MA |
| EW |
3 | W | 10 | +2 |
-660 | 59.09 |
| 7 | 28: T. Mikołajczyk - T. Pawlak, 6.0, MA |
| EW |
3 | S | J | -2 |
-100 | 28.79 |
| 7 | 28: T. Mikołajczyk - T. Pawlak, 6.0, MA |
| EW |
4 | W | 6 | = |
-420 | 24.24 |
