| 1 | 213: J. Radomski - J. Pisarek, 19.0, SL |
| EW |
3  | S | 4 | +2 |
460 | 11.15 |
| 1 | 213: J. Radomski - J. Pisarek, 19.0, SL |
| EW |
3  | N | A | +1 |
170 | 28.42 |
| 1 | 213: J. Radomski - J. Pisarek, 19.0, SL |
| EW |
3  | E | 8 | +2 |
-200 | 29.86 |
| 2 | 215: P. Matkowski - K. Śliwoń, 26.0, SL |
| EW |
2  | N | 6 | +2 |
170 | 27.34 |
| 2 | 215: P. Matkowski - K. Śliwoń, 26.0, SL |
| EW |
2  | W | 8 | +2 |
-170 | 7.19 |
| 2 | 215: P. Matkowski - K. Śliwoń, 26.0, SL |
| EW |
4 x | W | 4 | +1 |
-910 | 93.84 |
| 3 | 217: Z. Małek - K. Zieliński, 16.0, SL |
| EW |
1  | W | 2 | = |
-90 | 70.14 |
| 3 | 217: Z. Małek - K. Zieliński, 16.0, SL |
| EW |
1  | N | 7 | +1 |
90 | 49.28 |
| 3 | 217: Z. Małek - K. Zieliński, 16.0, SL |
| EW |
3  | W | 5 | +2 |
-660 | 89.57 |
| 4 | 224: J. Wacławczyk - S. Gęga, 4.0, SL |
| EW |
2  | E | K | = |
-110 | 12.95 |
| 4 | 224: J. Wacławczyk - S. Gęga, 4.0, SL |
| EW |
3  | N | Q | = |
140 | 3.63 |
| 4 | 224: J. Wacławczyk - S. Gęga, 4.0, SL |
| EW |
3  | E | A | = |
-140 | 78.06 |
| 5 | 208: S. Adamczyk - J. Radomski, 16.0, SL |
| NS |
4  | N | J | +1 |
650 | 57.19 |
| 5 | 208: S. Adamczyk - J. Radomski, 16.0, SL |
| NS |
2  | W | 4 | = |
-110 | 2.88 |
| 5 | 208: S. Adamczyk - J. Radomski, 16.0, SL |
| NS |
3  | S | 10 | +1 |
630 | 33.09 |
| 6 | 228: A. Wojnarowski - S. Wiszniewski, 11.0, OP |
| NS |
4  | S | J | = |
420 | 65.11 |
| 6 | 228: A. Wojnarowski - S. Wiszniewski, 11.0, OP |
| NS |
3  | S | A | = |
110 | 16.55 |
| 6 | 228: A. Wojnarowski - S. Wiszniewski, 11.0, OP |
| NS |
3  | N | 3 | +2 |
660 | 25.00 |
| 7 | 231: W. Konarzewski - Z. Sienicki, 15.5, SL |
| NS |
4  | W | J | = |
-620 | 77.34 |
| 7 | 231: W. Konarzewski - Z. Sienicki, 15.5, SL |
| NS |
2  | S | K | = |
90 | 34.53 |
| 7 | 231: W. Konarzewski - Z. Sienicki, 15.5, SL |
| NS |
3  | W | 4 | -1 |
50 | 50.36 |
| 8 | 216: W. Sołtysik - M. Witek, 25.0, SL/PK |
| EW |
5 x | S | A | -4 |
-800 | 97.84 |
| 8 | 216: W. Sołtysik - M. Witek, 25.0, SL/PK |
| EW |
7  | N | 2 | -1 |
-100 | 94.20 |
| 8 | 216: W. Sołtysik - M. Witek, 25.0, SL/PK |
| EW |
4  | N | 2 | = |
420 | 35.61 |
| 9 | 220: Z. Krzemiński - T. Gąsior, 12.5, SL |
| EW |
3  | W | 6 | = |
-140 | 86.37 |
| 9 | 220: Z. Krzemiński - T. Gąsior, 12.5, SL |
| EW |
7  | S | 7 | -1 |
-100 | 84.50 |
| 9 | 220: Z. Krzemiński - T. Gąsior, 12.5, SL |
| EW |
6 x | N | A | = |
1210 | 0.57 |