| 1 | 114: Z. Bartoszewski - W. Humienny, 0.0, |
| NS |
3  | N |  J | = |
140 | 52.81 |
| 1 | 114: Z. Bartoszewski - W. Humienny, 0.0, |
| NS |
2 | S |  6 | +2 |
170 | 66.50 |
| 1 | 114: Z. Bartoszewski - W. Humienny, 0.0, |
| NS |
5  | S | A | = |
400 | 59.30 |
| 2 | 113: L. Jurzysta - K. Mazurkiewicz, 0.0, KP/- |
| NS |
4 | S | 10 | +1 |
650 | 96.04 |
| 2 | 113: L. Jurzysta - K. Mazurkiewicz, 0.0, KP/- |
| NS |
4 | N | A | +1 |
450 | 70.03 |
| 2 | 113: L. Jurzysta - K. Mazurkiewicz, 0.0, KP/- |
| NS |
5 | W | 7 | = |
-400 | 23.49 |
| 3 | 112: T. Rumiński - A. Łoziński, 1.5, -/KP |
| NS |
4 | S | Q | +2 |
680 | 72.70 |
| 3 | 112: T. Rumiński - A. Łoziński, 1.5, -/KP |
| NS |
3  | S | 4 | +2 |
460 | 89.47 |
| 3 | 112: T. Rumiński - A. Łoziński, 1.5, -/KP |
| NS |
2 | N | 10 | +1 |
140 | 78.12 |
| 4 | 122: A. Janiszewski - M. Nowacka, 0.0, |
| NS |
2 x | W | K | = |
-670 | 2.47 |
| 4 | 122: A. Janiszewski - M. Nowacka, 0.0, |
| NS |
3 | N | 4 | = |
400 | 75.00 |
| 4 | 122: A. Janiszewski - M. Nowacka, 0.0, |
| NS |
2 | S | 8 | = |
110 | 76.72 |
| 5 | 120: E. Seichter - A. Seichter, 12.5, KP |
| NS |
3 | S | 7 | +2 |
460 | 58.85 |
| 5 | 120: E. Seichter - A. Seichter, 12.5, KP |
| NS |
3 | W | 10 | +3 |
-690 | 24.26 |
| 5 | 120: E. Seichter - A. Seichter, 12.5, KP |
| NS |
1 | E | 5 | -5 |
250 | 96.56 |
| 6 | 121: W. Kosiorek - M. Jackiewicz, 1.0, KP |
| NS |
3 | E | 10 | -2 |
200 | 78.69 |
| 6 | 121: W. Kosiorek - M. Jackiewicz, 1.0, KP |
| NS |
5 x | W | A | -1 |
200 | 58.85 |
| 6 | 121: W. Kosiorek - M. Jackiewicz, 1.0, KP |
| NS |
3 | E | 4 | = |
-400 | 3.80 |
| 7 | 118: A. Kita - J. Strześniewski, 0.0, KP/- |
| NS |
4 | S | A | +1 |
450 | 84.54 |
| 7 | 118: A. Kita - J. Strześniewski, 0.0, KP/- |
| NS |
4 | S | Q | +1 |
650 | 53.45 |
| 7 | 118: A. Kita - J. Strześniewski, 0.0, KP/- |
| NS |
3 | E | 5 | -1 |
50 | 78.71 |
| 8 | 119: J. Wajda - M. Nicewicz, 2.5, KP |
| EW |
2 | E | 6 | -2 |
100 | 53.96 |
| 8 | 119: J. Wajda - M. Nicewicz, 2.5, KP |
| EW |
2 | S | A | +2 |
170 | 29.44 |
| 8 | 119: J. Wajda - M. Nicewicz, 2.5, KP |
| EW |
2 x | S | K | -3 |
-500 | 96.02 |
| 9 | 116: M. Wyżlic - M. Figura, 4.0, KP |
| EW |
3 | S | 5 | = |
600 | 25.54 |
| 9 | 116: M. Wyżlic - M. Figura, 4.0, KP |
| EW |
2 | N | A | +2 |
130 | 35.90 |
| 9 | 116: M. Wyżlic - M. Figura, 4.0, KP |
| EW |
1 | W | 3 | = |
-90 | 73.69 |
| 10 | 117: W. Sturgulewski - A. Sturgulewski, 1.0, KP |
| EW |
2 | N | K | -1 |
-50 | 55.67 |
| 10 | 117: W. Sturgulewski - A. Sturgulewski, 1.0, KP |
| EW |
3 | S | J | +2 |
150 | 73.83 |
| 10 | 117: W. Sturgulewski - A. Sturgulewski, 1.0, KP |
| EW |
4 | W | A | -2 |
200 | 14.62 |
| 11 | 115: T. Woźniak - A. Wilemski, 10.0, KP |
| EW |
2 | W | J | -3 |
300 | 7.29 |
| 11 | 115: T. Woźniak - A. Wilemski, 10.0, KP |
| EW |
3 | S | Q | = |
600 | 30.30 |
| 11 | 115: T. Woźniak - A. Wilemski, 10.0, KP |
| EW |
6 | E | 4 | = |
-1430 | 84.88 |
