| 1 | 23: M. Betliński - S. Zimorski, 0.0, DS |
| NS |
TD | | | |
| 50.00 |
| 1 | 23: M. Betliński - S. Zimorski, 0.0, DS |
| NS |
2  | S | J | +2 |
180 | 58.93 |
| 1 | 23: M. Betliński - S. Zimorski, 0.0, DS |
| NS |
TD | | | |
| 50.00 |
| 2 | 24: A. Janiak - P. Birowski, 4.0, DS |
| NS |
4  | N | 4 | -1 |
-100 | 1.79 |
| 2 | 24: A. Janiak - P. Birowski, 4.0, DS |
| NS |
2  | N | 9 | -1 |
-100 | 89.29 |
| 2 | 24: A. Janiak - P. Birowski, 4.0, DS |
| NS |
4  | E | 3 | = |
-620 | 19.64 |
| 3 | 25: B. Wegner - J. Poznar, 16.0, DS |
| NS |
2  | S | Q | = |
110 | 26.79 |
| 3 | 25: B. Wegner - J. Poznar, 16.0, DS |
| NS |
3  | E | J | = |
-400 | 58.93 |
| 3 | 25: B. Wegner - J. Poznar, 16.0, DS |
| NS |
3  | N | 9 | +2 |
460 | 99.94 |
| 4 | 26: T. Zaborowski - A. Pigulski, 2.5, DS |
| NS |
4  | S | Q | = |
130 | 72.19 |
| 4 | 26: T. Zaborowski - A. Pigulski, 2.5, DS |
| NS |
3  | S | T | -2 |
-100 | 48.08 |
| 4 | 26: T. Zaborowski - A. Pigulski, 2.5, DS |
| NS |
3  | E | K | -2 |
100 | 80.36 |
| 5 | 27: R. Wisłocki - L. Grakowicz, 2.5, DS |
| NS |
4  | W | T | +2 |
-680 | 46.43 |
| 5 | 27: R. Wisłocki - L. Grakowicz, 2.5, DS |
| NS |
3  | W | 5 | +3 |
-490 | 66.07 |
| 5 | 27: R. Wisłocki - L. Grakowicz, 2.5, DS |
| NS |
3  | S | A | -1 |
-100 | 58.93 |
| 6 | 28: Z. Ciereszko - A. Poznysz, 21.0, DS |
| NS |
2  | S | 7 | +3 |
150 | 8.93 |
| 6 | 28: Z. Ciereszko - A. Poznysz, 21.0, DS |
| NS |
2  | S | 4 | +2 |
130 | 33.93 |
| 6 | 28: Z. Ciereszko - A. Poznysz, 21.0, DS |
| NS |
3  | N | 6 | -2 |
-200 | 42.86 |
| 7 | 29: Z. Szanduła - K. Lickiewicz, 3.0, DS |
| NS |
4 x | N | | = |
510 | 96.43 |
| 7 | 29: Z. Szanduła - K. Lickiewicz, 3.0, DS |
| NS |
2  | E | | -1 |
100 | 17.86 |
| 7 | 29: Z. Szanduła - K. Lickiewicz, 3.0, DS |
| NS |
2  | S | A | -1 |
-100 | 37.50 |
| 8 | 30: S. Cieśla - R. Siwiec, 7.0, DS |
| NS |
4  | W | Q | = |
-620 | 19.64 |
| 8 | 30: S. Cieśla - R. Siwiec, 7.0, DS |
| NS |
3 x | N | 4 | -3 |
-800 | 0.00 |
| 8 | 30: S. Cieśla - R. Siwiec, 7.0, DS |
| NS |
3  | S | Q | = |
140 | 57.14 |
| 9 | 31: W. Kozieł - M. Gołąbek, 2.0, DS |
| NS |
4  | W | 9 | +2 |
-680 | 64.29 |
| 9 | 31: W. Kozieł - M. Gołąbek, 2.0, DS |
| NS |
3  | N | T | = |
140 | 96.43 |
| 9 | 31: W. Kozieł - M. Gołąbek, 2.0, DS |
| NS |
4  | N | | +2 |
480 | 69.64 |