| 1 | 6: R. Siedlecki - R. Sadowski, 10.0, MA |
| NS |
3  | W |  A | -3 |
300 | 100.00 |
| 1 | 6: R. Siedlecki - R. Sadowski, 10.0, MA |
| NS |
4 | S |  K | = |
420 | 40.38 |
| 1 | 6: R. Siedlecki - R. Sadowski, 10.0, MA |
| NS |
5 | W |  4 | +1 |
-680 | 22.04 |
| 2 | 3: A. Łaszczotko - W. Kostrzewa, 8.0, MA |
| NS |
4 | S | A | -1 |
-100 | 21.88 |
| 2 | 3: A. Łaszczotko - W. Kostrzewa, 8.0, MA |
| NS |
4 | N | A | +1 |
450 | 69.47 |
| 2 | 3: A. Łaszczotko - W. Kostrzewa, 8.0, MA |
| NS |
2 | E |  5 | +1 |
-140 | 20.04 |
| 3 | 1: C. Czyżkowski - J. Koter, 17.0, MA |
| NS |
3 | E | A | -1 |
100 | 85.31 |
| 3 | 1: C. Czyżkowski - J. Koter, 17.0, MA |
| NS |
3 x | W | A | = |
-530 | 0.15 |
| 3 | 1: C. Czyżkowski - J. Koter, 17.0, MA |
| NS |
4 | W | J | = |
-420 | 22.04 |
| 4 | 10: K. Puczyński - W. Rutkowski, 17.0, MA |
| NS |
3 | W | 4 | = |
-140 | 65.98 |
| 4 | 10: K. Puczyński - W. Rutkowski, 17.0, MA |
| NS |
3 | E | J | = |
-400 | 16.05 |
| 4 | 10: K. Puczyński - W. Rutkowski, 17.0, MA |
| NS |
2 | S | 2 | -1 |
-100 | 59.99 |
| 5 | 4: K. Kwiatkowski - M. Kilanowski, 7.0, MA |
| NS |
6 | E | Q | +1 |
-1460 | 16.05 |
| 5 | 4: K. Kwiatkowski - M. Kilanowski, 7.0, MA |
| NS |
3 | N | Q | = |
600 | 79.96 |
| 5 | 4: K. Kwiatkowski - M. Kilanowski, 7.0, MA |
| NS |
4 | N | J | -1 |
-100 | 44.01 |
| 6 | 9: B. Kakietek - J. Tomaszczuk, 7.0, MA |
| NS |
3 | E | 7 | -2 |
200 | 67.97 |
| 6 | 9: B. Kakietek - J. Tomaszczuk, 7.0, MA |
| NS |
2 | W | 5 | = |
-120 | 55.99 |
| 6 | 9: B. Kakietek - J. Tomaszczuk, 7.0, MA |
| NS |
4 | W | Q | = |
-420 | 75.96 |
| 7 | 2: M. Rubanowska-Nierobisz - A. Nierobisz, 0.0, MA |
| NS |
4 | N | 7 | +1 |
450 | 63.46 |
| 7 | 2: M. Rubanowska-Nierobisz - A. Nierobisz, 0.0, MA |
| NS |
1 | E | 5 | -1 |
100 | 63.46 |
| 7 | 2: M. Rubanowska-Nierobisz - A. Nierobisz, 0.0, MA |
| NS |
3 | S | 5 | = |
400 | 55.77 |
| 8 | 7: R. Michalski - D. Wacławek, 5.0, MA |
| NS |
1 | S | 5 | +1 |
120 | 30.77 |
| 8 | 7: R. Michalski - D. Wacławek, 5.0, MA |
| NS |
3 | S | 10 | +1 |
170 | 36.54 |
| 8 | 7: R. Michalski - D. Wacławek, 5.0, MA |
| NS |
3 | N | A | +1 |
170 | 76.92 |
| 9 | 8: T. Mikołajczyk - T. Pawlak, 6.0, MA |
| NS |
3 x | E | A | -2 |
500 | 96.15 |
| 9 | 8: T. Mikołajczyk - T. Pawlak, 6.0, MA |
| NS |
4 | E | 10 | -1 |
50 | 82.69 |
| 9 | 8: T. Mikołajczyk - T. Pawlak, 6.0, MA |
| NS |
2 | W | Q | +2 |
-170 | 15.38 |
