| 1 | 82: T. Przybycień - A. Kokoszyński, 2.0, MP |
| NS |
5  x | E |  T | -5 |
1100 | 95.69 |
| 1 | 82: T. Przybycień - A. Kokoszyński, 2.0, MP |
| NS |
4 | N | 9 | +1 |
650 | 76.88 |
| 1 | 82: T. Przybycień - A. Kokoszyński, 2.0, MP |
| NS |
2  | N |  7 | +2 |
170 | 25.79 |
| 1 | 82: T. Przybycień - A. Kokoszyński, 2.0, MP |
| NS |
3  | N | K | = |
600 | 67.37 |
| 1 | 82: T. Przybycień - A. Kokoszyński, 2.0, MP |
| NS |
2 | S | 4 | +2 |
170 | 80.00 |
| 1 | 82: T. Przybycień - A. Kokoszyński, 2.0, MP |
| NS |
3 | S | 8 | = |
110 | 52.11 |
| 1 | 82: T. Przybycień - A. Kokoszyński, 2.0, MP |
| NS |
1 | S | 7 | -2 |
-200 | 1.05 |
| 1 | 82: T. Przybycień - A. Kokoszyński, 2.0, MP |
| NS |
2 | E | A | +2 |
-180 | 81.58 |
| 1 | 82: T. Przybycień - A. Kokoszyński, 2.0, MP |
| NS |
3 | N | A | -1 |
-50 | 52.66 |
| 1 | 82: T. Przybycień - A. Kokoszyński, 2.0, MP |
| NS |
3 | E | 7 | +3 |
-690 | 57.45 |
| 1 | 83: J. Świder - M. Hul, 0.0, MP |
| NS |
4 x | W | A | -1 |
100 | 53.68 |
| 1 | 83: J. Świder - M. Hul, 0.0, MP |
| NS |
3 x | N | T | -3 |
-800 | 0.53 |
| 1 | 83: J. Świder - M. Hul, 0.0, MP |
| NS |
5 x | N | A | +1 |
950 | 84.74 |
| 1 | 83: J. Świder - M. Hul, 0.0, MP |
| NS |
5 | S | Q | = |
400 | 70.53 |
| 1 | 83: J. Świder - M. Hul, 0.0, MP |
| NS |
3 x | E | 9 | -2 |
300 | 65.26 |
| 1 | 83: J. Świder - M. Hul, 0.0, MP |
| NS |
4 | N | A | +1 |
450 | 78.42 |
| 1 | 83: J. Świder - M. Hul, 0.0, MP |
| NS |
3 | N | J | +1 |
170 | 31.05 |
| 1 | 83: J. Świder - M. Hul, 0.0, MP |
| NS |
2 | S | Q | +1 |
140 | 50.53 |
| 1 | 83: J. Świder - M. Hul, 0.0, MP |
| NS |
3 | W | 9 | -2 |
200 | 88.95 |
| 1 | 83: J. Świder - M. Hul, 0.0, MP |
| NS |
2 | S | A | +3 |
200 | 49.46 |
| 1 | 84: M. Bajorek - S. Kowalski, 2.0, MP |
| NS |
4 | E | 6 | = |
-420 | 21.05 |
| 1 | 84: M. Bajorek - S. Kowalski, 2.0, MP |
| NS |
6 | E | A | +1 |
-1460 | 26.84 |
| 1 | 84: M. Bajorek - S. Kowalski, 2.0, MP |
| NS |
3 | N | A | -2 |
-200 | 12.95 |
| 1 | 84: M. Bajorek - S. Kowalski, 2.0, MP |
| NS |
3 | N | 6 | = |
110 | 46.07 |
| 1 | 84: M. Bajorek - S. Kowalski, 2.0, MP |
| NS |
3 | S | K | +2 |
460 | 48.89 |
| 1 | 84: M. Bajorek - S. Kowalski, 2.0, MP |
| NS |
5 | W | 9 | -1 |
100 | 92.75 |
| 1 | 84: M. Bajorek - S. Kowalski, 2.0, MP |
| NS |
4 | S | 8 | -1 |
-50 | 23.73 |
| 1 | 84: M. Bajorek - S. Kowalski, 2.0, MP |
| NS |
3 | E | A | -1 |
50 | 67.18 |
| 1 | 84: M. Bajorek - S. Kowalski, 2.0, MP |
| NS |
3 | N | 4 | +2 |
660 | 56.74 |
| 1 | 84: M. Bajorek - S. Kowalski, 2.0, MP |
| NS |
4 | S | A | +1 |
450 | 39.89 |
