| 1 | 7: R. Pietrzak - K. Wierzbicki, 0.0, |
| EW |
2  | E |  A | -3 |
300 | 5.56 |
| 1 | 7: R. Pietrzak - K. Wierzbicki, 0.0, |
| EW |
3  | N | K | = |
110 | 50.00 |
| 1 | 7: R. Pietrzak - K. Wierzbicki, 0.0, |
| EW |
2  | E |  2 | = |
-120 | 72.22 |
| 2 | 4: R. Siedlecki - R. Sadowski, 10.0, MA |
| EW |
7 | N | 6 | -1 |
-100 | 91.67 |
| 2 | 4: R. Siedlecki - R. Sadowski, 10.0, MA |
| EW |
5 | S | Q | = |
400 | 16.67 |
| 2 | 4: R. Siedlecki - R. Sadowski, 10.0, MA |
| EW |
1 xx | S | K | +4 |
1830 | 0.00 |
| 3 | 3: T. Mikołajczyk - T. Pawlak, 6.0, MA |
| EW |
2 | W | 10 | -4 |
400 | 44.44 |
| 3 | 3: T. Mikołajczyk - T. Pawlak, 6.0, MA |
| EW |
3 | S | 10 | = |
400 | 36.11 |
| 3 | 3: T. Mikołajczyk - T. Pawlak, 6.0, MA |
| EW |
1 x | W | 8 | = |
-180 | 100.00 |
| 4 | 12: P. Józefaciuk - W. Rutkowski, 6.0, MA |
| EW |
2 | S | Q | = |
110 | 47.22 |
| 4 | 12: P. Józefaciuk - W. Rutkowski, 6.0, MA |
| EW |
4 | N | 3 | = |
620 | 50.00 |
| 4 | 12: P. Józefaciuk - W. Rutkowski, 6.0, MA |
| EW |
3 | S | 6 | -2 |
-200 | 63.89 |
| 5 | 1: I. Ziółkowska - A. Ziółkowski, 0.0, MA |
| EW |
2 | S | A | = |
110 | 36.11 |
| 5 | 1: I. Ziółkowska - A. Ziółkowski, 0.0, MA |
| EW |
2 | N | 6 | +1 |
150 | 50.00 |
| 5 | 1: I. Ziółkowska - A. Ziółkowski, 0.0, MA |
| EW |
6 | S | A | = |
980 | 47.22 |
| 6 | 5: A. Łaszczotko - J. Tomaszczuk, 5.5, MA |
| EW |
1 | N | J | +1 |
110 | 13.89 |
| 6 | 5: A. Łaszczotko - J. Tomaszczuk, 5.5, MA |
| EW |
4 | S | Q | = |
620 | 25.00 |
| 6 | 5: A. Łaszczotko - J. Tomaszczuk, 5.5, MA |
| EW |
3 | S | 2 | -1 |
-50 | 61.73 |
| 7 | 10: R. Michalski - E. Treichel, 5.0, MA |
| EW |
2 | N | A | +1 |
110 | 25.00 |
| 7 | 10: R. Michalski - E. Treichel, 5.0, MA |
| EW |
1 | W | 5 | -2 |
100 | 2.78 |
| 7 | 10: R. Michalski - E. Treichel, 5.0, MA |
| EW |
4 | S | 4 | = |
420 | 69.44 |
| 8 | 6: M. Nierobisz - A. Nierobisz, 0.0, |
| EW |
1 | S | 3 | -2 |
-200 | 69.44 |
| 8 | 6: M. Nierobisz - A. Nierobisz, 0.0, |
| EW |
4 | S | Q | = |
130 | 100.00 |
| 8 | 6: M. Nierobisz - A. Nierobisz, 0.0, |
| EW |
4 | E | 9 | = |
-620 | 77.78 |
| 9 | 2: C. Czyżkowski - J. Koter, 17.0, MA |
| EW |
3 | W | 4 | = |
-600 | 77.78 |
| 9 | 2: C. Czyżkowski - J. Koter, 17.0, MA |
| EW |
4 | W | 9 | = |
-420 | 25.00 |
| 9 | 2: C. Czyżkowski - J. Koter, 17.0, MA |
| EW |
4 | N | 9 | = |
420 | 38.89 |
