2 | 157: W. Wnuk - Z. Koza, 4.5, PM |
| EW |
3 | N | 5 | +2 |
150 | 9.26 |
2 | 157: W. Wnuk - Z. Koza, 4.5, PM |
| EW |
3 | W | 4 | -1 |
50 | 33.73 |
2 | 157: W. Wnuk - Z. Koza, 4.5, PM |
| EW |
5 x | S | 2 | -1 |
-200 | 76.52 |
3 | 164: B. Gierulski - M. Ratkowski, 33.0, WP/WM |
| EW |
4 | S | A | = |
130 | 35.00 |
3 | 164: B. Gierulski - M. Ratkowski, 33.0, WP/WM |
| EW |
4 | E | K | +1 |
-450 | 50.75 |
3 | 164: B. Gierulski - M. Ratkowski, 33.0, WP/WM |
| EW |
7 | E | 9 | = |
-2140 | 99.47 |
4 | 163: I. Iwanow - J. Sukow, 13.5, WM |
| NS |
3 x | S | 5 | -2 |
-300 | 2.90 |
4 | 163: I. Iwanow - J. Sukow, 13.5, WM |
| NS |
2 | N | 5 | -2 |
-100 | 50.13 |
4 | 163: I. Iwanow - J. Sukow, 13.5, WM |
| NS |
4 | E | K | -1 |
50 | 61.26 |
5 | 148: Z. Nowak - R. Aljemous, 5.0, PM/NZ |
| EW |
3 | N | 6 | +2 |
460 | 4.22 |
5 | 148: Z. Nowak - R. Aljemous, 5.0, PM/NZ |
| EW |
5 | E | 6 | -1 |
50 | 14.65 |
5 | 148: Z. Nowak - R. Aljemous, 5.0, PM/NZ |
| EW |
2 | S | 6 | +1 |
140 | 33.29 |
5 | 152: W. Nowicki - B. Banaszkiewicz, 0.0, WP/PM |
| NS |
2 | S | 2 | +1 |
140 | 56.01 |
5 | 152: W. Nowicki - B. Banaszkiewicz, 0.0, WP/PM |
| NS |
1 | N | A | -2 |
-200 | 6.41 |
5 | 152: W. Nowicki - B. Banaszkiewicz, 0.0, WP/PM |
| NS |
1 | S | 3 | +1 |
120 | 67.94 |
5 | 161: A. Fronczak - K. Konefał, 22.0, WM |
| NS |
2 | W | K | -3 |
150 | 90.73 |
5 | 161: A. Fronczak - K. Konefał, 22.0, WM |
| NS |
3 | W | T | = |
-110 | 44.01 |
5 | 161: A. Fronczak - K. Konefał, 22.0, WM |
| NS |
4 x | S | A | -2 |
-300 | 74.08 |
6 | 150: B. Jabłoński - M. Sarnowski, 0.0, WM/NZ |
| NS |
3 | S | A | -1 |
-100 | 37.34 |
6 | 150: B. Jabłoński - M. Sarnowski, 0.0, WM/NZ |
| NS |
2 | E | 5 | -1 |
50 | 74.87 |
6 | 150: B. Jabłoński - M. Sarnowski, 0.0, WM/NZ |
| NS |
3 | E | 5 | = |
-600 | 16.85 |
7 | 160: J. Szechlicki - H. Hacik, 2.0, WM |
| EW |
4 | E | A | = |
-620 | 91.34 |
7 | 160: J. Szechlicki - H. Hacik, 2.0, WM |
| EW |
2 | N | 3 | = |
90 | 35.36 |
7 | 160: J. Szechlicki - H. Hacik, 2.0, WM |
| EW |
2 | N | 7 | +1 |
150 | 67.76 |
8 | 162: L. Danielewicz - R. Bieda, 0.0, WM/NZ |
| EW |
3 | E | J | -2 |
100 | 3.25 |
8 | 162: L. Danielewicz - R. Bieda, 0.0, WM/NZ |
| EW |
2 | S | T | = |
120 | 76.27 |
8 | 162: L. Danielewicz - R. Bieda, 0.0, WM/NZ |
| EW |
2 | W | 4 | -1 |
50 | 54.77 |
9 | 159: I. Ciszak - J. Ciszak, 0.0, NZ |
| NS |
2 | N | 6 | = |
110 | 85.21 |
9 | 159: I. Ciszak - J. Ciszak, 0.0, NZ |
| NS |
3 | W | 9 | -3 |
300 | 98.95 |
9 | 159: I. Ciszak - J. Ciszak, 0.0, NZ |
| NS |
4 x | E | 5 | = |
-590 | 5.91 |