| 1 | 24: T. Mikołajczyk - T. Pawlak, 6.0, MA |
| NS |
3  | E |  K | +1 |
-170 | 68.28 |
| 1 | 24: T. Mikołajczyk - T. Pawlak, 6.0, MA |
| NS |
3  | N | J | +2 |
150 | 71.94 |
| 1 | 24: T. Mikołajczyk - T. Pawlak, 6.0, MA |
| NS |
5 | E |  A | -1 |
100 | 64.63 |
| 2 | 25: M. Tekień - W. Kostrzewa, 7.0, MA |
| EW |
4 | W | J | = |
-620 | 47.62 |
| 2 | 25: M. Tekień - W. Kostrzewa, 7.0, MA |
| EW |
4 | N | A | +1 |
450 | 13.10 |
| 2 | 25: M. Tekień - W. Kostrzewa, 7.0, MA |
| EW |
4 | E | 4 | +2 |
-480 | 69.05 |
| 3 | 26: D. Wacławek - A. Łaszczotko, 6.0, MA |
| EW |
4 | W | J | = |
-620 | 53.66 |
| 3 | 26: D. Wacławek - A. Łaszczotko, 6.0, MA |
| EW |
2  | W | 6 | +1 |
-150 | 56.09 |
| 3 | 26: D. Wacławek - A. Łaszczotko, 6.0, MA |
| EW |
3 | W | K | +2 |
-150 | 25.62 |
| 4 | 21: C. Czyżkowski - J. Koter, 17.0, MA |
| NS |
2 | W | Q | +3 |
-150 | 74.38 |
| 4 | 21: C. Czyżkowski - J. Koter, 17.0, MA |
| NS |
2 | W | K | = |
-110 | 34.16 |
| 4 | 21: C. Czyżkowski - J. Koter, 17.0, MA |
| NS |
3 | W | K | -1 |
50 | 69.50 |
| 5 | 22: D. Gelo - K. Puczyński, 14.5, MA |
| EW |
4 | N | 6 | = |
620 | 33.77 |
| 5 | 22: D. Gelo - K. Puczyński, 14.5, MA |
| EW |
4 x | E | K | = |
-510 | 93.70 |
| 5 | 22: D. Gelo - K. Puczyński, 14.5, MA |
| EW |
2 | W | A | -1 |
50 | 42.51 |
| 6 | 28: E. Wróblewska - S. Stachlewski, 13.0, MA |
| NS |
4 | N | Q | = |
420 | 62.19 |
| 6 | 28: E. Wróblewska - S. Stachlewski, 13.0, MA |
| NS |
4 | N | A | = |
620 | 80.47 |
| 6 | 28: E. Wróblewska - S. Stachlewski, 13.0, MA |
| NS |
3 | N | J | +2 |
460 | 62.19 |
| 7 | 27: M. Kilanowski - K. Kwiatkowski, 7.0, MA |
| EW |
3 | N | 4 | -2 |
-100 | 75.60 |
| 7 | 27: M. Kilanowski - K. Kwiatkowski, 7.0, MA |
| EW |
1 | S | 7 | +1 |
120 | 39.03 |
| 7 | 27: M. Kilanowski - K. Kwiatkowski, 7.0, MA |
| EW |
4 | E | K | = |
-420 | 62.19 |
| 8 | 30: R. Siedlecki - R. Sadowski, 10.0, MA |
| EW |
2 x | S | A | -3 |
-800 | 89.00 |
| 8 | 30: R. Siedlecki - R. Sadowski, 10.0, MA |
| EW |
4 x | W | 2 | -2 |
300 | 3.68 |
| 8 | 30: R. Siedlecki - R. Sadowski, 10.0, MA |
| EW |
2 | N | 9 | +2 |
170 | 36.59 |
| 9 | 29: M. Wrocławski - W. Rutkowski, 6.0, MA |
| NS |
3 | W | 7 | +2 |
-660 | 48.78 |
| 9 | 29: M. Wrocławski - W. Rutkowski, 6.0, MA |
| NS |
1 | E | 2 | +2 |
-150 | 58.53 |
| 9 | 29: M. Wrocławski - W. Rutkowski, 6.0, MA |
| NS |
3 | W | 9 | = |
-140 | 48.58 |
