1 | 599: B. Jurecki - R. Stankiewicz, 0.0, NZ |
| NS |
4 | E | | -1 |
50 | 89.83 |
1 | 599: B. Jurecki - R. Stankiewicz, 0.0, NZ |
| NS |
3 | W | | -2 |
100 | 55.51 |
1 | 599: B. Jurecki - R. Stankiewicz, 0.0, NZ |
| NS |
1 | W | | = |
-80 | 61.90 |
1 | 599: B. Jurecki - R. Stankiewicz, 0.0, NZ |
| NS |
1 | N | | +2 |
150 | 59.10 |
1 | 599: B. Jurecki - R. Stankiewicz, 0.0, NZ |
| NS |
4 | N | | +2 |
680 | 20.34 |
2 | 598: W. Pietrzak - A. Czumaj, 7.0, WM |
| EW |
5 | N | | -2 |
-100 | 54.38 |
2 | 598: W. Pietrzak - A. Czumaj, 7.0, WM |
| EW |
2 | S | | -6 |
-600 | 95.49 |
2 | 598: W. Pietrzak - A. Czumaj, 7.0, WM |
| EW |
4 x | W | | -1 |
200 | 0.71 |
2 | 598: W. Pietrzak - A. Czumaj, 7.0, WM |
| EW |
2 | W | | +2 |
-170 | 8.05 |
2 | 598: W. Pietrzak - A. Czumaj, 7.0, WM |
| EW |
5 x | W | | -2 |
300 | 45.62 |
2 | 600: J. Jegliński - T. Kądzielewski, 14.0, WM |
| EW |
3 | N | | +2 |
460 | 10.29 |
2 | 600: J. Jegliński - T. Kądzielewski, 14.0, WM |
| EW |
3 | W | | -1 |
100 | 32.58 |
2 | 600: J. Jegliński - T. Kądzielewski, 14.0, WM |
| EW |
4 | N | | +2 |
480 | 41.62 |
2 | 600: J. Jegliński - T. Kądzielewski, 14.0, WM |
| EW |
3 | N | | +2 |
460 | 32.81 |
2 | 600: J. Jegliński - T. Kądzielewski, 14.0, WM |
| EW |
3 | W | | -1 |
100 | 49.30 |
2 | 596: C. Micewicz - T. Szlazko, 0.0, NZ |
| EW |
3 | W | | -1 |
50 | 42.09 |
2 | 596: C. Micewicz - T. Szlazko, 0.0, NZ |
| EW |
2 | E | | +2 |
-170 | 39.14 |
2 | 596: C. Micewicz - T. Szlazko, 0.0, NZ |
| EW |
5 | E | | +2 |
-710 | 66.43 |
2 | 596: C. Micewicz - T. Szlazko, 0.0, NZ |
| EW |
4 | E | | -2 |
100 | 21.17 |
2 | 596: C. Micewicz - T. Szlazko, 0.0, NZ |
| EW |
2 | E | | -1 |
100 | 19.27 |
3 | 593: P. Czacharowski - J. Wiszniewski, 0.0, NZ |
| EW |
4 | N | | = |
620 | 62.50 |
3 | 593: P. Czacharowski - J. Wiszniewski, 0.0, NZ |
| EW |
1 | E | | -1 |
50 | 22.44 |
3 | 593: P. Czacharowski - J. Wiszniewski, 0.0, NZ |
| EW |
4 x | N | | = |
790 | 12.68 |
3 | 593: P. Czacharowski - J. Wiszniewski, 0.0, NZ |
| EW |
6 | W | | = |
-1440 | 73.10 |
3 | 595: M. Grodzki - H. Łakomski, 16.0, WM |
| NS |
3 | N | | = |
110 | 44.90 |
3 | 595: M. Grodzki - H. Łakomski, 16.0, WM |
| NS |
3 | S | | +2 |
660 | 18.96 |
3 | 595: M. Grodzki - H. Łakomski, 16.0, WM |
| NS |
4 | W | | -2 |
200 | 83.24 |
3 | 595: M. Grodzki - H. Łakomski, 16.0, WM |
| NS |
3 | N | | +1 |
430 | 30.72 |
4 | 597: D. Łukaszewicz - B. Diakite, 0.0, NZ |
| NS |
4 | N | | +2 |
480 | 92.94 |
4 | 597: D. Łukaszewicz - B. Diakite, 0.0, NZ |
| NS |
4 | S | | = |
420 | 80.98 |
4 | 597: D. Łukaszewicz - B. Diakite, 0.0, NZ |
| NS |
3 | S | | +1 |
630 | 94.50 |
4 | 597: D. Łukaszewicz - B. Diakite, 0.0, NZ |
| NS |
3 | N | | +2 |
150 | 15.21 |
4 | 597: D. Łukaszewicz - B. Diakite, 0.0, NZ |
| NS |
1 | W | | = |
-90 | 65.62 |