0 | 90: J. Milewski - J. Cichowski, 1.5, MA |
| NS |
2 | S | K | = |
110 | 23.33 |
0 | 90: J. Milewski - J. Cichowski, 1.5, MA |
| NS |
4 | W | 10 | -3 |
150 | 81.67 |
0 | 90: J. Milewski - J. Cichowski, 1.5, MA |
| NS |
5 | W | 10 | -1 |
100 | 86.11 |
0 | 92: S. Grędziński - M. Rutkowski, 12.0, WM/MA |
| EW |
3 | N | A | +2 |
200 | 61.67 |
0 | 92: S. Grędziński - M. Rutkowski, 12.0, WM/MA |
| EW |
2 | N | Q | = |
120 | 23.60 |
0 | 92: S. Grędziński - M. Rutkowski, 12.0, WM/MA |
| EW |
1 | W | 5 | -1 |
100 | 32.78 |
0 | 87: B. Ojrzyński - J. Durski, 0.0, MA |
| EW |
4 | E | A | +1 |
-650 | 40.56 |
0 | 87: B. Ojrzyński - J. Durski, 0.0, MA |
| EW |
3 | N | 3 | = |
400 | 20.00 |
0 | 87: B. Ojrzyński - J. Durski, 0.0, MA |
| EW |
5 | N | | -2 |
-100 | 61.80 |
0 | 96: J. Pałysa - J. Oleksiak, 0.0, MA/- |
| EW |
3 | N | 3 | -2 |
-200 | 91.67 |
0 | 96: J. Pałysa - J. Oleksiak, 0.0, MA/- |
| EW |
3 | E | 2 | +3 |
-490 | 76.40 |
0 | 96: J. Pałysa - J. Oleksiak, 0.0, MA/- |
| EW |
2 | E | 3 | +2 |
-180 | 40.56 |
0 | 98: J. Sadowski - B. Jaskulski, 6.0, MA |
| EW |
3 | S | Q | +3 |
690 | 7.40 |
0 | 98: J. Sadowski - B. Jaskulski, 6.0, MA |
| EW |
3 | S | 6 | +2 |
460 | 4.44 |
0 | 98: J. Sadowski - B. Jaskulski, 6.0, MA |
| EW |
3 | N | W | -1 |
-100 | 50.00 |
0 | 89: A. Niewiadomski - W. Adamkiewicz, 8.0, MA |
| NS |
6 | N | K | = |
980 | 80.90 |
0 | 89: A. Niewiadomski - W. Adamkiewicz, 8.0, MA |
| NS |
3 | N | A | +1 |
170 | 68.89 |
0 | 89: A. Niewiadomski - W. Adamkiewicz, 8.0, MA |
| NS |
4 | W | 4 | +1 |
-450 | 25.56 |
0 | 95: A. Makarewicz - M. Wierzbicki, 0.0, MA |
| NS |
4 | S | A | -3 |
-150 | 76.11 |
0 | 95: A. Makarewicz - M. Wierzbicki, 0.0, MA |
| NS |
2 | N | A | +1 |
140 | 90.90 |
0 | 95: A. Makarewicz - M. Wierzbicki, 0.0, MA |
| NS |
4 | E | W | = |
-420 | 50.00 |
0 | 93: A. Mazur - W. Surmacz, 1.5, MA |
| EW |
5 | S | 6 | -1 |
-50 | 66.67 |
0 | 93: A. Mazur - W. Surmacz, 1.5, MA |
| EW |
3 | W | 4 | = |
-600 | 89.44 |
0 | 93: A. Mazur - W. Surmacz, 1.5, MA |
| EW |
3 | E | 5 | = |
-400 | 48.33 |