| 1 | 59: M. Cieniewicz - W. Makarewicz, 5.0, MA |
| EW |
5  x | W |  K | -2 |
500 | 0.71 |
| 1 | 59: M. Cieniewicz - W. Makarewicz, 5.0, MA |
| EW |
4  | E | 5 | = |
-620 | 64.28 |
| 2 | 66: B. Matejczyk - A. Klimek, 0.0, |
| EW |
4 | E | K | -2 |
200 | 83.09 |
| 2 | 66: B. Matejczyk - A. Klimek, 0.0, |
| EW |
4 | E | 7 | = |
-420 | 80.98 |
| 3 | 53: A. Zaręba - P. Godlewski, 2.0, MA |
| EW |
6 | N |  2 | = |
980 | 42.15 |
| 3 | 53: A. Zaręba - P. Godlewski, 2.0, MA |
| EW |
3  | S | 2 | -2 |
-200 | 68.56 |
| 4 | 57: S. Dybiec - S. Berwid, 5.0, MA |
| NS |
3 | E | 10 | -2 |
100 | 47.10 |
| 4 | 57: S. Dybiec - S. Berwid, 5.0, MA |
| NS |
3 | N | Q | +1 |
630 | 48.55 |
| 5 | 54: B. Kamiński - E. Treichel, 3.5, MA |
| NS |
5 x | S | 2 | -2 |
-300 | 88.72 |
| 5 | 54: B. Kamiński - E. Treichel, 3.5, MA |
| NS |
2 | N | 5 | +4 |
170 | 21.13 |
| 7 | 52: P. Jasiński - J. Andruszkiewicz, 2.5, MA |
| NS |
4 x | N | K | = |
790 | 97.12 |
| 7 | 52: P. Jasiński - J. Andruszkiewicz, 2.5, MA |
| NS |
3 | W | A | -3 |
300 | 74.64 |
| 8 | 51: S. Mączka - K. Bączek, 3.5, MA |
| EW |
3 | N | K | -1 |
-100 | 83.80 |
| 8 | 51: S. Mączka - K. Bączek, 3.5, MA |
| EW |
4 x | S | Q | -1 |
-100 | 34.29 |
| 9 | 55: R. Kowalewicz - A. Sobula, 2.0, MA |
| EW |
2 | S | 5 | +3 |
150 | 57.04 |
| 9 | 55: R. Kowalewicz - A. Sobula, 2.0, MA |
| EW |
3 | E | 4 | -1 |
100 | 14.58 |
| 10 | 58: B. Ćwiek - T. Sadowski, 3.5, MA |
| NS |
4 | W | 8 | = |
-620 | 71.00 |
| 10 | 58: B. Ćwiek - T. Sadowski, 3.5, MA |
| NS |
4 | E | Q | = |
-620 | 61.97 |
| 11 | 62: K. Perkowska - L. Ostrowska, 2.5, MA |
| NS |
4 | E | 4 | +2 |
-680 | 47.18 |
| 11 | 62: K. Perkowska - L. Ostrowska, 2.5, MA |
| NS |
2 | S | 4 | = |
110 | 63.38 |
