1 | 89: E. Kozak - M. Silski, 1.5, ZP/- |
15 | NS |
6 | S | A | -2 |
-200 | 26.22 |
1 | 94: W. Glina - Z. Kwiatkowski, 0.0, |
21 | NS |
4 | S | Q | +2 |
680 | 88.05 |
1 | 94: W. Glina - Z. Kwiatkowski, 0.0, |
22 | NS |
4 | W | 6 | -1 |
100 | 77.89 |
2 | 89: E. Kozak - M. Silski, 1.5, ZP/- |
16 | NS |
3 | W | 4 | = |
-600 | 37.82 |
2 | 89: E. Kozak - M. Silski, 1.5, ZP/- |
17 | NS |
3 | S | 6 | -1 |
-50 | 58.32 |
2 | 89: E. Kozak - M. Silski, 1.5, ZP/- |
18 | NS |
4 | W | 4 | = |
-420 | 68.84 |
2 | 94: W. Glina - Z. Kwiatkowski, 0.0, |
19 | NS |
6 | E | 3 | -4 |
400 | 96.38 |
2 | 94: W. Glina - Z. Kwiatkowski, 0.0, |
20 | NS |
4 | N | Q | +3 |
710 | 59.51 |
3 | 96: M. Sankiewicz - B. Tomaszewski, 5.0, ZP/- |
11 | EW |
4 | N | 4 | +1 |
450 | 53.49 |
3 | 96: M. Sankiewicz - B. Tomaszewski, 5.0, ZP/- |
12 | EW |
2 x | N | 6 | = |
670 | 0.03 |
3 | 96: M. Sankiewicz - B. Tomaszewski, 5.0, ZP/- |
13 | EW |
5 x | W | 9 | -2 |
500 | 54.76 |
3 | 96: M. Sankiewicz - B. Tomaszewski, 5.0, ZP/- |
14 | EW |
6 | E | 4 | +1 |
-1010 | 88.96 |
3 | 93: W. Jackowski - L. Sulżycki, 11.0, ZP |
23 | EW |
3 | E | 4 | +1 |
-130 | 41.86 |
3 | 93: W. Jackowski - L. Sulżycki, 11.0, ZP |
24 | EW |
3 | S | 4 | +1 |
430 | 27.92 |
3 | 93: W. Jackowski - L. Sulżycki, 11.0, ZP |
25 | EW |
3 | E | T | -1 |
100 | 38.64 |
4 | 93: W. Jackowski - L. Sulżycki, 11.0, ZP |
26 | EW |
1 | E | 2 | -1 |
100 | 21.59 |
5 | 95: A. Kondyjowska - J. Antoniewicz, 4.0, ZP/- |
6 | EW |
5 | W | Q | = |
-600 | 48.81 |
5 | 95: A. Kondyjowska - J. Antoniewicz, 4.0, ZP/- |
7 | EW |
2 | N | K | +1 |
140 | 44.19 |
5 | 95: A. Kondyjowska - J. Antoniewicz, 4.0, ZP/- |
8 | EW |
3 x | S | 4 | = |
470 | 5.84 |
5 | 95: A. Kondyjowska - J. Antoniewicz, 4.0, ZP/- |
9 | EW |
4 | S | 9 | -1 |
-50 | 69.76 |
5 | 95: A. Kondyjowska - J. Antoniewicz, 4.0, ZP/- |
10 | EW |
1 | E | 7 | +1 |
-110 | 43.03 |
5 | 90: J. Jermakowicz - H. Pakuła, 4.0, -/ZP |
27 | NS |
1 | S | K | -1 |
-50 | 21.74 |
5 | 90: J. Jermakowicz - H. Pakuła, 4.0, -/ZP |
28 | NS |
3 | W | K | +3 |
-490 | 1.09 |
5 | 90: J. Jermakowicz - H. Pakuła, 4.0, -/ZP |
29 | NS |
5 | E | 6 | +1 |
-680 | 71.53 |
5 | 90: J. Jermakowicz - H. Pakuła, 4.0, -/ZP |
30 | NS |
6 | E | A | = |
-980 | 9.63 |
7 | 92: E. Kaczmarek - C. Wojtaś, 14.0, ZP |
1 | EW |
3 | E | 4 | +2 |
-150 | 80.92 |
7 | 92: E. Kaczmarek - C. Wojtaś, 14.0, ZP |
2 | EW |
3 | S | A | -1 |
-100 | 42.86 |
7 | 92: E. Kaczmarek - C. Wojtaś, 14.0, ZP |
3 | EW |
4 x | S | 5 | -1 |
-100 | 78.54 |
7 | 92: E. Kaczmarek - C. Wojtaś, 14.0, ZP |
4 | EW |
3 | E | Q | +4 |
-720 | 36.92 |
7 | 92: E. Kaczmarek - C. Wojtaś, 14.0, ZP |
5 | EW |
3 | W | 8 | +2 |
-460 | 82.87 |