1 | 56: R. Andrrzej - I. Henryk, 0.0, |
| NS |
3 | E | 3 | +1 |
-430 | 93.75 |
1 | 56: R. Andrrzej - I. Henryk, 0.0, |
| NS |
3 | W | J | +3 |
-490 | 14.06 |
1 | 56: R. Andrrzej - I. Henryk, 0.0, |
| NS |
3 | E | 2 | = |
-110 | 93.75 |
1 | 56: R. Andrrzej - I. Henryk, 0.0, |
| NS |
3 | N | 4 | +1 |
170 | 50.00 |
1 | 56: R. Andrrzej - I. Henryk, 0.0, |
| NS |
5 x | E | K | -3 |
500 | 100.00 |
1 | 56: R. Andrrzej - I. Henryk, 0.0, |
| NS |
3 | S | 4 | +2 |
460 | 85.94 |
2 | 53: M. Kalinowski - T. Wiśniewski, 6.0, MA |
| NS |
3 | E | 9 | -1 |
100 | 31.25 |
2 | 53: M. Kalinowski - T. Wiśniewski, 6.0, MA |
| NS |
3 | W | J | -1 |
50 | 76.56 |
2 | 53: M. Kalinowski - T. Wiśniewski, 6.0, MA |
| NS |
4 x | S | K | = |
590 | 90.63 |
2 | 53: M. Kalinowski - T. Wiśniewski, 6.0, MA |
| NS |
3 | S | 6 | +1 |
630 | 59.38 |
2 | 53: M. Kalinowski - T. Wiśniewski, 6.0, MA |
| NS |
5 x | E | A | -4 |
800 | 93.75 |
2 | 53: M. Kalinowski - T. Wiśniewski, 6.0, MA |
| NS |
2 | N | 9 | +2 |
170 | 57.81 |
3 | 58: S. Dutkiewicz - Z. Szczechowicz, 7.5, MA |
| EW |
4 | N | A | +1 |
150 | 70.31 |
3 | 58: S. Dutkiewicz - Z. Szczechowicz, 7.5, MA |
| EW |
2 | E | 5 | = |
-120 | 76.56 |
3 | 58: S. Dutkiewicz - Z. Szczechowicz, 7.5, MA |
| EW |
4 x | N | K | -2 |
-500 | 93.51 |
3 | 58: S. Dutkiewicz - Z. Szczechowicz, 7.5, MA |
| EW |
3 | N | 2 | -2 |
-100 | 89.06 |
3 | 58: S. Dutkiewicz - Z. Szczechowicz, 7.5, MA |
| EW |
3 | S | 5 | = |
400 | 76.56 |
3 | 58: S. Dutkiewicz - Z. Szczechowicz, 7.5, MA |
| EW |
2 | S | 3 | +1 |
110 | 21.88 |
4 | 57: J. Kawczyński - A. Ejnik, 10.0, MA |
| EW |
2 | E | 3 | = |
-110 | 95.31 |
4 | 57: J. Kawczyński - A. Ejnik, 10.0, MA |
| EW |
3 | N | 2 | = |
110 | 54.69 |
4 | 57: J. Kawczyński - A. Ejnik, 10.0, MA |
| EW |
6 | S | 9 | -2 |
-200 | 74.17 |
4 | 57: J. Kawczyński - A. Ejnik, 10.0, MA |
| EW |
4 | E | 2 | -1 |
100 | 14.06 |
4 | 57: J. Kawczyński - A. Ejnik, 10.0, MA |
| EW |
4 | E | J | +1 |
-650 | 34.38 |
4 | 57: J. Kawczyński - A. Ejnik, 10.0, MA |
| EW |
3 | W | Q | -3 |
150 | 15.63 |
5 | 54: Z. Marcinkowski - H. Misiarz, 2.5, MA |
| EW |
1 | S | 10 | -1 |
-100 | 74.89 |
5 | 54: Z. Marcinkowski - H. Misiarz, 2.5, MA |
| EW |
3 | E | 5 | = |
-400 | 99.78 |
5 | 54: Z. Marcinkowski - H. Misiarz, 2.5, MA |
| EW |
3 | E | 10 | = |
-400 | 54.48 |
5 | 54: Z. Marcinkowski - H. Misiarz, 2.5, MA |
| EW |
3 | W | K | +2 |
-660 | 98.98 |
5 | 54: Z. Marcinkowski - H. Misiarz, 2.5, MA |
| EW |
4 | W | 2 | -1 |
50 | 65.47 |