1 | 54: M. Himicz - G. Szelenbaum, 1.0, -/MA |
| NS |
4 | N | 2 | = |
420 | 100.00 |
1 | 54: M. Himicz - G. Szelenbaum, 1.0, -/MA |
| NS |
3 | N | 5 | -1 |
-50 | 26.56 |
1 | 54: M. Himicz - G. Szelenbaum, 1.0, -/MA |
| NS |
4 | S | 3 | -2 |
-200 | 3.13 |
2 | 55: A. Sokołowski - S. Tyndorf, 5.5, MA |
| NS |
3 x | N | A | -2 |
-300 | 71.88 |
2 | 55: A. Sokołowski - S. Tyndorf, 5.5, MA |
| NS |
4 x | N | 6 | -3 |
-800 | 7.81 |
2 | 55: A. Sokołowski - S. Tyndorf, 5.5, MA |
| NS |
4 | N | 6 | = |
620 | 46.88 |
3 | 56: S. Okonkowski - C. Okonkowska, 2.0, -/MA |
| NS |
4 | E | 2 | +2 |
-680 | 68.75 |
3 | 56: S. Okonkowski - C. Okonkowska, 2.0, -/MA |
| NS |
3 | E | 5 | -1 |
100 | 85.94 |
3 | 56: S. Okonkowski - C. Okonkowska, 2.0, -/MA |
| NS |
3 | E | 10 | +1 |
-430 | 64.06 |
4 | 57: L. Łuniewski - J. Szczygieł, 16.0, LD/MA |
| NS |
3 | N | 5 | +2 |
200 | 40.63 |
4 | 57: L. Łuniewski - J. Szczygieł, 16.0, LD/MA |
| NS |
3 | E | Q | -2 |
200 | 93.75 |
4 | 57: L. Łuniewski - J. Szczygieł, 16.0, LD/MA |
| NS |
3 x | E | 4 | -2 |
300 | 95.31 |
5 | 58: D. Jagodziński - S. Malanowski, 4.0, MA |
| NS |
2 | E | 5 | +1 |
-110 | 25.00 |
5 | 58: D. Jagodziński - S. Malanowski, 4.0, MA |
| NS |
3 xx | S | K | -3 |
-1600 | 0.00 |
5 | 58: D. Jagodziński - S. Malanowski, 4.0, MA |
| NS |
4 | N | 5 | -1 |
-50 | 45.31 |
6 | 59: P. Watemborski - K. Buchalski, 3.0, MA/KP |
| NS |
3 | N | J | +1 |
170 | 70.95 |
6 | 59: P. Watemborski - K. Buchalski, 3.0, MA/KP |
| NS |
3 | W | 2 | = |
-110 | 48.39 |
6 | 59: P. Watemborski - K. Buchalski, 3.0, MA/KP |
| NS |
3 | S | 6 | = |
400 | 13.41 |
7 | 60: J. Nowicki - M. Kanty, 0.0, |
| NS |
4 | S | J | +1 |
650 | 59.38 |
7 | 60: J. Nowicki - M. Kanty, 0.0, |
| NS |
3 | W | J | +2 |
-150 | 90.63 |
7 | 60: J. Nowicki - M. Kanty, 0.0, |
| NS |
6 | S | 6 | = |
990 | 78.13 |
8 | 61: J. Krajewski - Z. Leśniewski, 0.5, -/KP |
| NS |
3 x | W | 4 | -2 |
500 | 96.88 |
8 | 61: J. Krajewski - Z. Leśniewski, 0.5, -/KP |
| NS |
4 x | E | A | -3 |
500 | 100.00 |
8 | 61: J. Krajewski - Z. Leśniewski, 0.5, -/KP |
| NS |
3 | N | 2 | -1 |
-100 | 45.31 |
9 | 62: T. Gawroński - R. Kiełkiewicz, 8.0, MA |
| NS |
3 | N | 4 | -3 |
-300 | 9.38 |
9 | 62: T. Gawroński - R. Kiełkiewicz, 8.0, MA |
| NS |
3 | S | 10 | = |
400 | 62.50 |
9 | 62: T. Gawroński - R. Kiełkiewicz, 8.0, MA |
| NS |
3 | S | J | +1 |
170 | 51.56 |