| 633: J. Leszko - J. Leszko, 2.0, -/LU |
| NS |
2 | E | 4 | -1 |
50 | 58.83 |
| 633: J. Leszko - J. Leszko, 2.0, -/LU |
| NS |
4 | S | J | = |
620 | 54.83 |
| 633: J. Leszko - J. Leszko, 2.0, -/LU |
| NS |
4 | W | 7 | -1 |
100 | 69.77 |
| 633: J. Leszko - J. Leszko, 2.0, -/LU |
| NS |
2 | E | 4 | +2 |
-130 | 34.11 |
| 633: J. Leszko - J. Leszko, 2.0, -/LU |
| NS |
3 | S | Q | +2 |
660 | 93.54 |
| 633: J. Leszko - J. Leszko, 2.0, -/LU |
| NS |
4 | E | J | = |
-620 | 50.83 |
| 634: W. Błaszczak - W. Betiuk, 0.0, SW/- |
| NS |
2 | N | J | +2 |
170 | 67.49 |
| 634: W. Błaszczak - W. Betiuk, 0.0, SW/- |
| NS |
3 | N | 3 | +1 |
170 | 66.50 |
| 634: W. Błaszczak - W. Betiuk, 0.0, SW/- |
| NS |
6 x | S | 6 | = |
1090 | 100.00 |
| 634: W. Błaszczak - W. Betiuk, 0.0, SW/- |
| NS |
2 | N | 3 | +3 |
210 | 77.56 |
| 634: W. Błaszczak - W. Betiuk, 0.0, SW/- |
| NS |
3 | N | 2 | +1 |
430 | 57.28 |
| 634: W. Błaszczak - W. Betiuk, 0.0, SW/- |
| NS |
4 x | E | K | -4 |
800 | 96.47 |
| 635: J. Wawryniuk - H. Prędkiewicz, 4.0, LU/- |
| NS |
6 | S | J | = |
1430 | 93.42 |
| 635: J. Wawryniuk - H. Prędkiewicz, 4.0, LU/- |
| NS |
3 | S | A | +1 |
430 | 72.20 |
| 635: J. Wawryniuk - H. Prędkiewicz, 4.0, LU/- |
| NS |
5 x | W | A | -2 |
300 | 98.35 |
| 635: J. Wawryniuk - H. Prędkiewicz, 4.0, LU/- |
| NS |
4 x | W | A | -2 |
500 | 83.72 |
| 635: J. Wawryniuk - H. Prędkiewicz, 4.0, LU/- |
| NS |
3 | N | 6 | +1 |
430 | 95.72 |
| 635: J. Wawryniuk - H. Prędkiewicz, 4.0, LU/- |
| NS |
3 | S | 5 | +1 |
170 | 87.87 |
| 636: Z. Grzesiuk - Z. Skolimowski, 3.0, LU/- |
| NS |
3 | S | 7 | +2 |
460 | 58.85 |
| 636: Z. Grzesiuk - Z. Skolimowski, 3.0, LU/- |
| NS |
4 | W | 4 | +1 |
-660 | 64.59 |
| 636: Z. Grzesiuk - Z. Skolimowski, 3.0, LU/- |
| NS |
2 | N | A | +3 |
200 | 82.62 |
| 636: Z. Grzesiuk - Z. Skolimowski, 3.0, LU/- |
| NS |
4 | E | 9 | -2 |
200 | 78.69 |
| 636: Z. Grzesiuk - Z. Skolimowski, 3.0, LU/- |
| NS |
5 | W | A | -1 |
100 | 35.08 |
| 636: Z. Grzesiuk - Z. Skolimowski, 3.0, LU/- |
| NS |
2 | E | K | -1 |
50 | 35.48 |
| 637: G. Cieślak - R. Zając, 6.0, LU |
| NS |
4 | S | K | = |
420 | 48.36 |
| 637: G. Cieślak - R. Zając, 6.0, LU |
| NS |
4 | S | Q | +1 |
650 | 53.45 |
| 637: G. Cieślak - R. Zając, 6.0, LU |
| NS |
TD | | | |
| 50.00 |
| 637: G. Cieślak - R. Zając, 6.0, LU |
| NS |
3 | W | 4 | -2 |
100 | 46.04 |
| 637: G. Cieślak - R. Zając, 6.0, LU |
| NS |
3 | E | J | -3 |
300 | 90.13 |
| 637: G. Cieślak - R. Zając, 6.0, LU |
| NS |
3 | W | Q | = |
-400 | 58.77 |