1 | 527: J. Janiak - B. Pietkiewicz, 10.0, WM/NZ |
| NS |
2 x | W | | = |
-670 | 2.47 |
1 | 527: J. Janiak - B. Pietkiewicz, 10.0, WM/NZ |
| NS |
3 | N | | -2 |
-100 | 13.16 |
1 | 527: J. Janiak - B. Pietkiewicz, 10.0, WM/NZ |
| NS |
2 | W | | +2 |
-170 | 10.98 |
1 | 527: J. Janiak - B. Pietkiewicz, 10.0, WM/NZ |
| NS |
5 | S | | = |
400 | 12.13 |
1 | 527: J. Janiak - B. Pietkiewicz, 10.0, WM/NZ |
| NS |
6 | W | | = |
-1370 | 2.79 |
1 | 532: W. Bielski - S. Hartwig, 5.5, WM |
| NS |
2 | N | | +1 |
140 | 36.07 |
1 | 532: W. Bielski - S. Hartwig, 5.5, WM |
| NS |
1 | N | | -2 |
-100 | 37.05 |
1 | 532: W. Bielski - S. Hartwig, 5.5, WM |
| NS |
4 | E | | = |
-620 | 7.70 |
1 | 532: W. Bielski - S. Hartwig, 5.5, WM |
| NS |
3 | W | | -2 |
100 | 66.01 |
1 | 532: W. Bielski - S. Hartwig, 5.5, WM |
| NS |
4 | S | | = |
420 | 48.36 |
2 | 531: A. Cydejko - J. Stańczak, 14.0, WM |
| EW |
4 | S | | +1 |
650 | 46.55 |
2 | 531: A. Cydejko - J. Stańczak, 14.0, WM |
| EW |
3 | E | | -1 |
50 | 21.29 |
2 | 531: A. Cydejko - J. Stańczak, 14.0, WM |
| EW |
3 x | W | | -3 |
500 | 8.09 |
2 | 531: A. Cydejko - J. Stańczak, 14.0, WM |
| EW |
3 | W | | -3 |
300 | 9.87 |
3 | 533: T. Roszkowska-Śliż - J. Jaszczak, 0.0, WM/NZ |
| EW |
4 | E | | +2 |
-680 | 67.11 |
3 | 533: T. Roszkowska-Śliż - J. Jaszczak, 0.0, WM/NZ |
| EW |
2 | W | | -1 |
100 | 63.86 |
3 | 533: T. Roszkowska-Śliż - J. Jaszczak, 0.0, WM/NZ |
| EW |
2 | N | | +1 |
140 | 63.04 |
3 | 533: T. Roszkowska-Śliż - J. Jaszczak, 0.0, WM/NZ |
| EW |
2 | N | | +2 |
130 | 84.05 |
3 | 533: T. Roszkowska-Śliż - J. Jaszczak, 0.0, WM/NZ |
| EW |
3 | N | | -1 |
-100 | 75.25 |
3 | 534: R. Łasowski - D. Łuczak, 11.0, WM |
| EW |
3 | N | | +3 |
230 | 78.14 |
3 | 534: R. Łasowski - D. Łuczak, 11.0, WM |
| EW |
5 | W | | = |
-400 | 76.51 |
3 | 534: R. Łasowski - D. Łuczak, 11.0, WM |
| EW |
6 x | S | | = |
1660 | 0.17 |
3 | 534: R. Łasowski - D. Łuczak, 11.0, WM |
| EW |
3 | S | | +2 |
150 | 47.70 |
3 | 534: R. Łasowski - D. Łuczak, 11.0, WM |
| EW |
2 | N | | +1 |
140 | 21.88 |
3 | 528: M. Ceglecki - J. Wiśnik, 2.0, NZ |
| EW |
3 | E | | = |
-400 | 41.23 |
3 | 528: M. Ceglecki - J. Wiśnik, 2.0, NZ |
| EW |
3 | N | | = |
600 | 25.54 |
3 | 528: M. Ceglecki - J. Wiśnik, 2.0, NZ |
| EW |
3 | N | | = |
110 | 57.67 |
3 | 528: M. Ceglecki - J. Wiśnik, 2.0, NZ |
| EW |
2 | W | | -2 |
100 | 32.71 |
4 | 530: K. Bojarczuk - W. Kozłowski, 0.0, NZ |
| NS |
2 | N | | -2 |
-100 | 26.00 |
4 | 530: K. Bojarczuk - W. Kozłowski, 0.0, NZ |
| NS |
1 | S | | +4 |
150 | 26.17 |
4 | 530: K. Bojarczuk - W. Kozłowski, 0.0, NZ |
| NS |
4 | W | | = |
-620 | 29.07 |
4 | 530: K. Bojarczuk - W. Kozłowski, 0.0, NZ |
| NS |
4 | E | | = |
-130 | 34.11 |
4 | 530: K. Bojarczuk - W. Kozłowski, 0.0, NZ |
| NS |
4 | N | | = |
620 | 80.63 |