1 | 25: T. Sułkowski - S. Rokicki, 7.0, MA |
| EW |
3 | E | 2 | +2 |
-200 | 42.86 |
1 | 25: T. Sułkowski - S. Rokicki, 7.0, MA |
| EW |
3 | N | 10 | -1 |
-50 | 83.33 |
1 | 25: T. Sułkowski - S. Rokicki, 7.0, MA |
| EW |
1 | S | 2 | = |
90 | 14.29 |
2 | 23: J. Olszewski - H. Kędziorek, 2.0, MA |
| NS |
2 | N | | +3 |
200 | 94.90 |
2 | 23: J. Olszewski - H. Kędziorek, 2.0, MA |
| NS |
4 | E | A | +1 |
-450 | 40.48 |
2 | 23: J. Olszewski - H. Kędziorek, 2.0, MA |
| NS |
3 | E | 4 | -6 |
600 | 100.00 |
3 | 18: J. Jaworski - E. Błachnio, 1.5, MA |
| NS |
3 | E | K | -2 |
200 | 40.48 |
3 | 18: J. Jaworski - E. Błachnio, 1.5, MA |
| NS |
4 | N | K | = |
420 | 73.81 |
3 | 18: J. Jaworski - E. Błachnio, 1.5, MA |
| NS |
5 x | W | | -1 |
100 | 77.44 |
5 | 17: Z. Olszewski - J. Stanaszek, 4.0, MA/- |
| EW |
2 | W | | +1 |
-150 | 84.92 |
5 | 17: Z. Olszewski - J. Stanaszek, 4.0, MA/- |
| EW |
2 | S | | -1 |
-100 | 16.67 |
5 | 17: Z. Olszewski - J. Stanaszek, 4.0, MA/- |
| EW |
3 | E | | -1 |
50 | 9.52 |
6 | 20: B. Stankiewicz - W. Kała, 3.0, -/MA |
| NS |
3 | N | | = |
110 | 50.00 |
6 | 20: B. Stankiewicz - W. Kała, 3.0, -/MA |
| NS |
3 x | E | | -6 |
1700 | 95.24 |
6 | 20: B. Stankiewicz - W. Kała, 3.0, -/MA |
| NS |
1 | N | | +4 |
210 | 84.92 |
7 | 24: K. Sokół - D. Węgrowicz, 8.0, MA |
| EW |
3 | E | | -1 |
100 | 7.14 |
7 | 24: K. Sokół - D. Węgrowicz, 8.0, MA |
| EW |
2 | E | | -2 |
200 | 9.52 |
7 | 24: K. Sokół - D. Węgrowicz, 8.0, MA |
| EW |
3 | S | | = |
600 | 20.07 |
8 | 19: B. Musiał - A. Musiał, 0.0, |
| NS |
3 | S | | = |
600 | 47.62 |
8 | 19: B. Musiał - A. Musiał, 0.0, |
| NS |
5 x | E | | = |
-550 | 2.38 |
8 | 19: B. Musiał - A. Musiał, 0.0, |
| NS |
4 x | N | | -3 |
-500 | 0.00 |
9 | 22: J. Kilanowicz-Bosek - J. Bejma, 4.0, MA |
| EW |
3 | N | | = |
400 | 61.90 |
9 | 22: J. Kilanowicz-Bosek - J. Bejma, 4.0, MA |
| EW |
5 | S | | = |
600 | 76.19 |
9 | 22: J. Kilanowicz-Bosek - J. Bejma, 4.0, MA |
| EW |
5 x | W | | -2 |
500 | 0.00 |